Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Propofol 1% versus propofol 2% in children undergoing minor ENT surgery
M Pellégrini1, C Lysakowski, L Dumont
1Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. michel.pellegrini@hcuge.ch
Insights
Propofol 1% and 2% demonstrate similar efficacy for inducing anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing ENT surgery. Both concentrations offer comparable safety profiles and intubating conditions, making them suitable alternatives.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Anesthesia
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Investigated induction characteristics of propofol 1% versus 2% in pediatric patients.
- Study focused on children undergoing otolaryngology (ENT) surgery.
- Employed a prospective, randomized, double-blind design for robust comparison.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the induction properties of propofol 1% and 2% in children.
- To evaluate safety and efficacy for anesthesia induction in pediatric ENT surgery.
Main Methods:
- 108 children received either propofol 1% (n=55) or 2% (n=53) for anesthesia induction and maintenance.
- Propofol was administered at 4 mg/kg at a constant rate (1200 ml/h), supplemented with alfentanil.
- Intubating conditions were assessed without neuromuscular blocking agents.
Main Results:
- Propofol 2% showed a more rapid loss of consciousness (47s vs. 54s; P=0.02).
- Pain on injection was slightly higher with propofol 2% (21% vs. 9%), though not statistically significant (P=0.09).
- No significant differences were observed in spontaneous movements, intubating conditions, hemodynamic changes, or adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Propofol 1% and 2% exhibit comparable performance for anesthesia induction in pediatric ENT surgery.
- Both concentrations provide satisfactory intubating conditions and similar safety profiles.
- The choice between propofol 1% and 2% may not significantly impact outcomes for this patient group.
Background:
The induction characteristics of propofol 1% and 2% were compared in children undergoing ENT surgery, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Methods:
One hundred and eight children received propofol 1% (n=55) or 2% (n=53) for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. For induction, propofol 4 mg kg(-1) was injected at a constant rate (1200 ml h(-1)), supplemented with alfentanil. Intubating conditions without the use of a neuromuscular blocking agent were scored.
Results:
Pain on injection occurred in 9% and 21% of patients after propofol 1% and 2%, respectively (P=0.09). Loss of consciousness was more rapid with propofol 2% compared with propofol 1% (47 s vs 54 s; P=0.02). Spontaneous movements during induction occurred in 22% and 34% (P=0.18), and intubating conditions were satisfactory in 87% and 96% (P=0.19) of children receiving propofol 1% or 2%, respectively. There were no differences between the two groups in respect of haemodynamic changes or adverse events.
Conclusions:
For the end-points tested, propofol 1% and propofol 2% are similar for induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing minor ENT surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia