Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of Respiration

Assessment of Respiration

The respiratory system's basic structures and primary functions lay the foundation for nurses' comprehensive respiratory assessments. This assessment includes subjective and objective data to gauge the patient's respiratory health.
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...

Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection

Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection

Physical assessment of the respiratory tract through inspection is a crucial step in understanding the patient's respiratory health. It provides insights into the functioning of the respiratory system, the musculoskeletal structure, and even the patient's nutritional status. This comprehensive approach involves observing several vital aspects: chest configuration, breathing patterns, respiratory rates, skin color, and use of accessory muscles.
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration can...

Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion

Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion

Respiratory system abnormalities are a significant concern in healthcare due to their potential to indicate underlying severe conditions like Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, and pneumonia. These abnormalities can often be detected through physical examination methods like inspection and percussion.
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and the...

Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation

Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation

Introduction
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.

Development of the Oral Microbiota

Development of the Oral Microbiota

The establishment of the oral microbiome begins before birth, challenging the long-held belief that the fetal oral cavity is sterile. The presence of oral microbes such as Streptococcus and Fusobacterium in amniotic fluid suggests that microbial exposure may occur in utero, potentially through translocation from the maternal oral or gastrointestinal tract. This early colonization primes the neonatal immune system and sets the stage for subsequent microbial succession. Maternal health,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Guided growth: Current concepts and novel techniques for harnessing a child's growth potential.

Journal of children's orthopaedics·2026

Same author

WaSTE: a multicentre audit of waste segregation practices in elective knee and hip arthroplasty.

Bone & joint open·2026

Same author

Guided growth for the correction of angular lower limb deformity: Correction rates for idiopathic and non-idiopathic aetiologies.

Journal of children's orthopaedics·2026

Same author

Occupational radiation exposure to UK orthopaedic surgeons: a dose monitoring exercise.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026

Same author

A global core outcome set for orthopaedic interventions in children with spinal dysraphism : aiming to enhance research quality and patient outcomes.

Bone & joint open·2025

Same author

Evaluation of X-ray Personal protective equipment for Orthopaedic Surgeons in theatrE (EXPOSEd) study : a national survey of Trauma & Orthopaedic surgeons.

Bone & joint open·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

Neonatal hip screening.

Deborah M Eastwood¹

¹Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and Royal Free Hospital, NW3 2QG, London, UK. deborah_eastwood@lineone.net

Lancet (London, England)

|February 25, 2003

Summary

Universal screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) showed impressive results in Coventry, UK. This approach may offer a gold standard for early detection and improved outcomes in infants with hip conditions.

Area of Science:

Orthopedics
Pediatric screening
Hip development

Background:

Congenital hip dislocation (CDH), now termed developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), poses significant risks if missed.
Screening programs aim for early detection, but challenges exist due to poor understanding of neonatal hip maturation.
Effectiveness of clinical and ultrasound screening for DDH remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of universal versus selective screening programs for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
To compare outcomes of different screening strategies in newborn infants.

Main Methods:

A prospective randomized trial involving over 15,500 newborn babies was conducted.
The study compared universal screening with selective screening programs.

More Related Videos

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Published on: September 11, 2018

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Published on: March 6, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale

Published on: August 25, 2014

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children

Published on: September 11, 2018

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus

Published on: March 6, 2019

Outcomes were assessed with a follow-up period of 6-11 years.

Main Results:

One case of late-detected hip dysplasia occurred in the universal screening group, versus six in the selective group (not statistically significant).
No additional benefit from universal screening was found when an excellent clinical program was already in place.
The universal screening program in Coventry, UK, demonstrated impressive and superior results compared to other UK centers.

Conclusions:

Screening program aims must be clearly defined and rigorously evaluated.
While cost is a factor, the human cost of missed diagnoses is immeasurable.
The success of the Coventry universal screening program suggests it could serve as a benchmark for achieving better outcomes in DDH detection elsewhere.