Related Experiment Videos

Endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: 17-year review of results in Ukraine

D Y Krivchenya1, M I Silchenko, V P Soroka

  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, National Medical University, Kiev, Kiev 02087, Erevanskaya 8A/83, P.O. Box 721, Ukraine.

Insights

For Hirschsprung

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • Colorectal Surgery

Background:

  • Hirschsprung's disease (HD) treatment involves surgical procedures where surgeon preference often dictates technique.
  • Optimal patient outcomes require careful consideration of complications and mortality associated with different surgical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung's disease using hand-sutured anastomosis (HSA) versus stapled anastomosis (SA).
  • To evaluate early and long-term complication rates and overall patient satisfaction between HSA and SA techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 275 children undergoing endorectal pull-through for HD.
  • Procedures involved Soave-Boley dissection with either a hand-sutured (210 patients) or stapled (65 patients) primary perineal colorectal anastomosis.
  • Follow-up duration ranged from 1 month to 15 years.

Main Results:

  • Early postoperative complications occurred in 13 HSA patients and 5 SA patients.
  • Long-term follow-up showed comparable complication rates: 20.5% for HSA and 13.8% for SA.
  • The overall complication rate was 2.91%, consistent with published literature.

Conclusions:

  • Both hand-sutured and stapled anastomoses are effective for Hirschsprung's disease treatment.
  • Stapled anastomosis offers surgical convenience through a simpler and shorter procedure.
  • Long-term outcomes demonstrate the safety and efficacy of both techniques in managing Hirschsprung's disease.

Related Concept Videos