Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Kazunori Yoshida1, Masahiko Matsumoto, Takaaki Sugita
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Insights
For patients with moderate aortic stenosis needing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for those under 70 with rapid stenosis progression. Older patients without rapid progression may only need CABG.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Aortic Stenosis Management
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common procedure for coronary artery disease.
- Aortic stenosis (AS) often coexists with coronary artery disease, necessitating careful treatment decisions.
- The optimal surgical strategy for patients with moderate AS undergoing CABG remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of combined CABG/aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus CABG alone in patients with moderate AS.
- To identify indications for AVR at the time of CABG in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 41 patients with moderate AS undergoing CABG between 1988 and 2001.
- Patients undergoing CABG alone were stratified into rapid (deltaP >/=10 mmHg/year) and slow progression groups based on echocardiography.
- Survival and event-free rates were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Combined CABG/AVR was performed in 26 patients; CABG alone in 15.
- For CABG-alone patients, 5-year survival was 92% and 10-year survival was 74%. Event-free rates were 65% (5-year) and 50% (10-year).
- Younger patients (<70 years) in the rapid progression group had a higher risk of re-operation.
Conclusions:
- Patients younger than 70 with risk factors for rapid AS progression benefit from combined CABG/AVR.
- Older patients (>70 years) without rapid progression risk factors may be suitable for CABG alone.
- Individualized surgical decision-making is crucial for patients with moderate AS undergoing CABG.
Abstract:
This study compared the outcomes of combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)/aortic valve replacement (AVR) and CABG alone in patients with moderate aortic stenosis and determined the possible indications for AVR at the time of CABG. Between December 1988 and January 2001, in Tenri Hospital, 41 patients with aortic stenosis underwent CABG: 26 patients underwent the combined procedure and 15 patients underwent CABG alone. The patients who underwent CABG alone were separated them into 2 groups on the basis of the results of annual echocardiography: the rapid progression group, defined by an increase of deltaP by >/=10 mmHg/year, and the slow progression group. Of the 15 patients who underwent CABG alone, the probability of survival at the end of the study in 2001 was 92% at 5 years and 74% at 10 years, and the respective event-free rates were 65% and 50%. Patients less than 70 years old and who were in the rapid progression group had a greater risk for re-operation. The study suggests that patients younger than 70 years old with risk factors for rapid progression should undergo CABG/AVR, and conversely, those older than 70 years old without the risk factors can undergo CABG only.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
