Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion - computerized tomographic colography is a better method for screening for polyps: arguments for the motion.

Benoit C Pineau1

  • 1Section of Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA. bpineau@wfubmc.edu

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology = Journal Canadien De Gastroenterologie
|February 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensitivity of upper endoscopy in diagnosing esophageal cancer.

Dysphagia·2006
Same author

Determination of qualitative telomerase activity as an adjunct to the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2006
Same author

AGA future trends report: CT colonography.

Gastroenterology·2004
Same author

Infectious complications of pancreatitis: diagnosis and management.

Current gastroenterology reports·2004
Same author

Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

JAMA·2004
Same author

Isolated proximal esophageal injury from blunt trauma: endoscopic stricture dilatation.

Dysphagia·2003

Virtual colonoscopy offers a less invasive and more acceptable alternative for colorectal cancer screening. This technique shows reasonable accuracy and may reduce the need for conventional colonoscopy in many patients.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer poses a significant public health challenge, necessitating effective screening methods.
  • Current screening modalities like fecal occult blood testing and conventional colonoscopy have limitations in accuracy, cost, and patient acceptance.
  • Poor compliance with screening recommendations is partly due to negative perceptions of existing methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate virtual colonoscopy (computerized tomographic colography) as a novel screening tool for colorectal cancer.
  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy, patient acceptability, and potential cost-effectiveness of virtual colonoscopy against conventional colonoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Virtual colonoscopy involves a minimally invasive radiological technique requiring thorough colonic cleansing, immobilization, and air insufflation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Diagnostic performance was assessed by comparing sensitivity and specificity rates with conventional colonoscopy.
  • Patient preference and acceptability were evaluated for repeat procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Virtual colonoscopy demonstrates reasonable sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional colonoscopy.
    • Conventional colonoscopy can be avoided in over two-thirds of cases examined.
    • The majority of patients found virtual colonoscopy more acceptable and preferred it for future screenings.

    Conclusions:

    • Virtual colonoscopy is a promising, minimally invasive technique for colorectal cancer screening.
    • Its higher patient acceptability and potential to reduce conventional colonoscopies could improve screening compliance.
    • Further economic analyses should incorporate indirect costs for a comprehensive cost-effectiveness evaluation.