Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion - computerized tomographic colography is a better method for screening for polyps: arguments against the

Jerome B Simon1

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Canada. simonj@post.queensu.ca

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology = Journal Canadien De Gastroenterologie
|February 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Computerized tomographic (CT) colography offers non-invasive colonic imaging but has limitations. It cannot detect subtle lesions, perform biopsies, or reliably distinguish stool from polyps, making it unsuitable for colorectal cancer screening.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Origins of the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver: A personal memoir.

Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie·2012
Same author

Costs of finding an advanced adenoma in colorectal screening.

Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie·2004
Same author

Re: Burke et al: positive fecal occult blood test.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2002
Same author

The IBS-36: a new quality of life measure for irritable bowel syndrome.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2002

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Computerized tomographic (CT) colography provides non-invasive imaging of the colon.
  • Conventional colonoscopy remains the gold standard for colorectal examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and limitations of CT colography as a diagnostic and screening tool for colorectal neoplasia.

Main Methods:

  • Review of CT colography's inherent limitations, including inability to detect subtle mucosal changes and perform biopsies.
  • Assessment of performance limitations such as poor sensitivity and specificity compared to colonoscopy.
  • Consideration of patient factors like bowel preparation and radiologist interpretation challenges.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • CT colography cannot visualize subtle mucosal lesions or allow for polyp biopsy/removal.
  • Distinguishing stool from polyps is challenging, often necessitating a follow-up colonoscopy.
  • Sensitivity and specificity are inferior to conventional colonoscopy, particularly for rectal, flat, and diminutive adenomas.
  • High cost, low cost-effectiveness, and significant interobserver variability were noted.

Conclusions:

  • CT colography is a diagnostic tool with significant limitations.
  • Its performance deficits, including poor detection rates and inability to biopsy, preclude its recommendation for colorectal neoplasia screening.