Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
[Coronary angiography with 4 f catheters by the radial: minimally invasive catheterization]
Marcelo Sanmartín1, Javier Goicolea, Daniel Meneses
1Unidad de Cardiología Intervencionista, Medtec, Hospital Meixoeiro, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain. marcelo.sanmartin.fernandez@sergas.es
Insights
4 French (F) catheters are effective for diagnostic cardiac catheterization via the radial artery approach. This study found optimal or acceptable image quality in most cases, with excellent correlation to 6 F catheters.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Interventional cardiology
- Medical device technology
Context:
- Limited experience exists with 4 French (F) catheters in cardiac catheterization.
- 4 F catheters may offer advantages over conventional 6 F catheters for radial artery access.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the preliminary experience with diagnostic radial artery catheterization using 4 F catheters.
- To assess the quality of angiographic images and compare quantitative data with 6 F catheters.
Summary:
- 206 diagnostic procedures using 4 F catheters via radial access were reviewed.
- Optimal or acceptable left coronary angiography was achieved in 98% and right coronary angiography in 100%.
- Excellent correlation (r=0.92) was found between quantitative angiographic data from 4 F and 6 F catheters, with no major complications.
Impact:
- 4 F catheters are suitable for routine use in diagnostic radial artery procedures.
- This supports the use of smaller caliber catheters for minimally invasive cardiac interventions.
- Findings may encourage wider adoption of 4 F catheters, potentially improving patient comfort and reducing vascular complications.
Introduction And Objectives:
Experience with 4 F catheters in cardiac catheterization is limited. These devices appear to be more suitable for the radial artery approach than conventional 6 F catheters.
Methods:
We analyze our preliminary experience with diagnostic catheterization of the radial artery with 4 F catheters. Angiographic images were evaluated using a predefined scale (1. poor; 2. acceptable; 3. optimal). In a subgroup of patients who underwent coronary angioplasty, the quantitative angiographic data obtained with the 4 F catheter were compared to those obtained with the 6 F guide catheter. In all cases the patients were clinically followed-up at 24 h and 7 days.
Results:
Two hundred and six studies performed over a 12-month period were reviewed. In 6 cases (2.9%) the femoral vein had to be used instead and in 4 cases (1.9%) the 4 F catheters were replaced by 6 F catheters. The left coronary angiography was graded as optimal in 83% and as acceptable in 15%. Right coronary artery images were considered optimal in 93% and acceptable in 7%. There was an excellent correlation between the reference diameter obtained by quantitative angiography with the 4 F catheter and values obtained with a 6 F guide catheter (r = 0.92; p < 0.01). No major vascular complications occurred.
Conclusion:
4 F catheters are appropriate for systematic use in diagnostic procedures using the radial access.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
