Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Class solutions for conformal external beam prostate radiotherapy.

Vincent S Khoo1, James L Bedford, Steve Webb

  • 1Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom. vincent.khoo@man.ac.uk

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|February 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of daily volumetric imaging on target tracking without fiducial markers during robotic treatment of pancreas.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

A beam model and Boltzmann solver for radiotherapy treatment planning of superficial brain metastases using a scanned electron beam at ultra-high (FLASH) dose rate.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Views on consent approaches used in emergency and critical care research: a rapid, systematic review.

Trials·2026
Same author

Metformin for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: a randomised phase 3 trial of the STAMPEDE platform protocol.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Platform trials: key features, when to use them and methodological challenges.

The Medical journal of Australia·2025
Same author

Infrastructure, capabilities, and capacities required for clinical trials design and delivery: A rapid scoping review of recommendations and regulations.

Wellcome open research·2025

A three-field (3F) conformal plan is effective for prostate radiotherapy, reducing rectal dose and complications compared to four-field (4F) or six-field (6F) plans. This approach optimizes treatment delivery while maintaining efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Planning

Background:

  • Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer.
  • Optimizing beam arrangements in CRT is crucial for minimizing dose to organs at risk, such as the rectum.
  • Comparing different field configurations (3F, 4F, 6F) helps determine the most effective planning strategy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify an optimal class solution coplanar plan for conformal non-intensity-modulated prostate radiotherapy.
  • To compare the efficacy of three-field (3F), four-field (4F), and six-field (6F) plans in terms of dose distribution and toxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 3F, 4F, and 6F plans in 10 prostate cancer patients with prostate-only (PO) and prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV) clinical target volumes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a 10 mm planning target volume margin and prescribed doses of 64 and 74 Gy.
  • Assessed rectal dose (V50, V80, V90), normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads, and tumor control probabilities (TCP).

    • Main Results:

    • A 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees) class solution plan demonstrated the lowest irradiated rectal volume and acceptable doses to bladder and femoral heads.
    • This 3F plan resulted in significant reductions in rectal V80 and V90 for both PO and PSV groups compared to other plans.
    • Higher prescribed doses (74 Gy) increased irradiated rectal volumes and rectal NTCPs across all plans.

    Conclusions:

    • Appropriate beam arrangement allows for a class solution plan using only 3 fields, offering advantages over 4F or 6F plans.
    • Both 3F (0, 90, 270 degrees) and 4F (35, 90, 270, 325 degrees) plans can serve as effective class solutions.
    • Practical considerations like delivery time, verification ease, and technological limitations influence the final choice of class solution plan.