Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance of different radiotherapy workload models.

Lisa Barbera1, Lynda D Jackson, Karleen Schulze

  • 1Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, and Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|February 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Preliminary Efficiency Evaluation of Upper Abdominal Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Following Personalized Screening Using Active Breathing Coordinator.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Prone Breast Radiotherapy on the MR-Linac: A Technical Note on Skin-Couch Contact Dose Effects.

Journal of medical radiation sciences·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer (TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II): a multicentre, non-randomised, phase 2 study.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: 5-year outcomes from a pooled analysis of the FASTRACK trials.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Clinical and Community Factors' Correlation With NT-proBNP in First Nations: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the CAHHM-FN Cohort.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Asundexian for Secondary Stroke Prevention.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

The revised basic treatment equivalent (BTE) model accurately estimated radiotherapy treatment times, outperforming other workload models. This model can improve patient scheduling and workload assessment in radiation oncology.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Accurate radiotherapy workload modeling is crucial for efficient patient scheduling and resource allocation.
  • Various models exist, but their performance needs validation with prospectively collected clinical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of different radiotherapy workload models.
  • To assess model accuracy and precision using a prospectively collected dataset from a single institution.

Main Methods:

  • Collected detailed radiotherapy treatment data for 151 patients over 2 weeks from three linear accelerators.
  • Evaluated the accuracy and precision of the original and revised basic treatment equivalent (BTE) model, Addenbrooke models, and equivalent simple treatment visit (ESTV) model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared model performance against local standards and fields per hour metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • The revised BTE model demonstrated superior performance compared to other evaluated models.
    • The revised BTE model estimated 88.0% of treatment times within a 5-minute margin.
    • Mean [observed -predicted] for the revised BTE model was 2.62 (2.44-2.80).

    Conclusions:

    • The revised BTE model showed consistent accuracy and precision, performing best among the assessed models.
    • This validated model is suitable for patient scheduling and describing radiotherapy workloads and case complexity.
    • The findings support the adoption of the revised BTE model in clinical practice for workload management.