Are district general hospital patients with unstable angina at a disadvantage?
C Miller1, K Lipscomb, N Curzen
1University of Manchester Medical School, UK.
Insights
Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes admitted to district general hospitals face longer waits for angiography and revascularisation compared to those admitted to a tertiary cardiac centre, indicating postcode-based inequity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Access to timely cardiac procedures is crucial for patients with acute coronary syndromes.
- District general hospitals (DGHs) may have varying access levels to tertiary cardiac services compared to base hospitals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare access to coronary angiography and revascularisation for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes admitted to DGHs versus a tertiary cardiac centre.
- To identify potential disparities in care based on hospital admission location.
Main Methods:
- Prospective monitoring of 184 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing angiography and revascularisation over three months.
- Comparison of waiting times from admission to procedures between patients admitted to a DGH and those admitted directly to the Manchester Heart Centre (MRI).
Main Results:
- Patients admitted to DGHs waited significantly longer for angiography (median 13 days) and revascularisation (median 15 days) compared to MRI patients (5 and 6 days, respectively).
- Once transferred to the tertiary centre, DGH patients received angiography rapidly (median 1 day).
- A higher proportion of DGH patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (22%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (46%) compared to MRI patients (9% and 36%).
Conclusions:
- Significant delays in accessing invasive cardiac procedures exist for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes admitted to DGHs.
- This inequity in access appears to be determined by geographical location (postcode) rather than clinical urgency.
Objective:
To determine whether patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes requiring coronary angiography and revascularisation have inferior access to these services if admitted to district general hospitals (DGHs) compared with similar patients admitted to a base hospital containing a tertiary cardiac centre.
Design:
Prospective, consecutive monitoring of all patients with acute coronary syndromes accepted by the tertiary cardiac centre for angiography and revascularisation over a three month period (1 April to 30 June 2002).
Participants:
All patients accepted for angiography from DGHs and from within the base hospital with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes.
Setting:
Tertiary cardiac facility (Manchester Heart Centre at Manchester Royal Infirmary (MRI)).
Main Outcome Measure:
Time waited from referral to angiography and revascularisation.
Results:
A total of 184 patients with a diagnosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes underwent angiography with a view to revascularisation. Of these, 89 (48%) were admitted initially to MRI and 95 (52%) were admitted to a feeder DGH. DGH patients waited significantly longer from admission to angiography than MRI patients (median 13 days (25th-75th percentiles 7-19) v 5 days (3-8) respectively; p<0.0005). DGH patients therefore also waited longer from admission to revascularisation (15 days (6-20) v 6 days (3-9) respectively). Once transferred into the Manchester Heart Centre, DGH patients underwent angiography within a median of 1 day (1-2). More DGH patients than those from MRI underwent both coronary artery bypass grafting (21 (22%) v 8 (9%) respectively; p=0.015) and percutaneous coronary intervention (44 (46%) v 32 (36%) respectively; p=NS).
Conclusion:
Patients admitted to feeder DGHs with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes wait significantly longer for access to invasive coronary assessment and revascularisation than similar patients admitted in the hospital that incorporates the tertiary cardiac centre. This inequity of access is determined by postcode rather than clinical priority.
More Related Videos
04:05Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 30, 2023
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina I: Introduction
Angina II: Classification
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
