Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

[VI: Confidence intervals--an alternative for p values].

Frank Krummenauer¹

¹Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik der Universität Mainz. krummi@imsd.uni-mainz.de

Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde

|March 4, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Validity of sample sizes in publications of randomised controlled trials on the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: cross-sectional evaluation.

BMJ open·2019

Same author

Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare<sup>®</sup> PRO-based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.

European journal of ophthalmology·2019

Same author

[Multi-disciplinary anonymous survey on a university hospital's medical doctors' knowledge of established terms and parameters in evidence-based medicine].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2019

Same author

[Do Clinical Trial Publications in AMD Healthcare Provide Sufficient Information on the Underlying Samples' Baseline Characteristics to Enable Generalizability Considerations on the Trial Design?]

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2019

Same author

Rotation of a toric intraocular lens with and without capsular tension ring: data from a multicenter non-inferiority randomized clinical trial (RCT).

BMC ophthalmology·2019

Same author

[An Illustrated Guidance for the Implementation of Methodological CONSORT Criteria in the Transparent Publication of RCTs in Ophthalmology].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2019

Confidence intervals integrate clinical relevance and statistical significance, simplifying scientific publications. They allow direct interpretation of results

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trials
Medical Research

Background:

Traditional statistical methods often present findings in complex tables.
Interpreting clinical significance alongside statistical significance can be challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

To demonstrate how confidence intervals can unify clinical relevance and statistical significance.
To highlight the efficiency of confidence intervals in scientific reporting.

Main Methods:

Utilizing confidence intervals for binary endpoints, such as relative risk.
Assessing statistical significance by checking if the interval includes the null value (e.g., '1' for relative risk).

Main Results:

Confidence intervals reduce the need for extensive tables and result sections.

Related Experiment Videos

The width of the confidence interval indicates the precision of the risk estimate.

The magnitude of the risk estimate within the interval reflects clinical relevance.

Conclusions:

Confidence intervals offer a single expression to convey both statistical significance and clinical impact.
Their use enhances the interpretability and conciseness of scientific publications.
Conclusions drawn from confidence intervals can be reliably extrapolated to the study population.