Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coincidence detection with dynamic synapses.

Lovorka Pantic1, Joaquín J Torres, Hilbert J Kappen

  • 1Department of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, Geert Groxteplein Noord 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Network (Bristol, England)
|March 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Astrocyte-mediated higher-order control of synaptic plasticity.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Information dynamics of in silico EEG Brain Waves: Insights into oscillations and functions.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Triadic percolation induces dynamical topological patterns in higher-order networks.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Integrated information decomposition unveils major structural traits of in silico and in vitro neuronal networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Postoperative Delirium After Intracranial Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

World neurosurgery·2023
Same author

Physics Clues on the Mind Substrate and Attributes.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2022
Same journal

Enhancing IoT security: A Creative Swagger Optimization algorithm for DDoS defence.

Network (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Parametric optimization for electrical discharge diamond grinding (EDDG) system using dual approach.

Network (Bristol, England)·2025
Same journal

A novel lung cancer diagnosis model using hybrid convolution (2D/3D)-based adaptive DenseUnet with attention mechanism.

Network (Bristol, England)·2025
Same journal

Hybrid optimization enabled Eff-FDMNet for Parkinson's disease detection and classification in federated learning.

Network (Bristol, England)·2025
Same journal

AI-driven plant disease detection with tailored convolutional neural network.

Network (Bristol, England)·2025
Same journal

Layer modified residual Unet++ for speech enhancement using Aquila Black widow optimizer algorithm.

Network (Bristol, England)·2025
See all related articles

Dynamic synapses enhance neuronal coincidence detection across a wider frequency range compared to static synapses. This finding is crucial for understanding neural information processing and synaptic plasticity.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Synaptic Plasticity
  • Neural Information Processing

Background:

  • Cortical synapse efficacy is experimentally shown to depend on presynaptic activity.
  • Traditional neural models often treat synapses as static, neglecting activity-dependent changes.
  • This oversight limits the accuracy of models in representing real neural network behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of activity-dependent (dynamic) synapses in neuronal responses.
  • To compare the coincidence detection capabilities of dynamic versus static synapses.
  • To analyze neuronal responses to temporal patterns of afferent activity.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations using both integrate-and-fire and Hodgkin-Huxley neuron models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of neuronal responses to various temporal patterns of afferent input.
  • Comparison of coincidence detection (CD) performance under dynamic and static synapse conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic synapses demonstrate coincidence detection over a significantly larger frequency range than static synapses.
    • This enhanced coincidence detection is observed for suitably chosen threshold values.
    • The findings hold true for different neuron models and various coincidence detection tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Activity-dependent synaptic dynamics are critical for accurate modeling of neural responses.
    • Dynamic synapses significantly improve coincidence detection capabilities in neural networks.
    • This study highlights the importance of incorporating synaptic plasticity into neural computational models.