Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Beyond randomization.

Mikel Aickin1

  • 1Oregon Center for Complementary, and Alternative Medicine, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region, Portland, OR, USA.

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (New York, N.Y.)
|March 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nontouch biofield therapy: a systematic review of human randomized controlled trials reporting use of only nonphysical contact treatment.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document.

Trials·2014
Same author

Families United/Familias Unidas: family group office visits to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

The Diabetes educator·2014
Same author

Description of a clinical stream of back-pain patients based on electronic medical records.

Complementary therapies in clinical practice·2013
Same author

Intervention in overweight children improves body mass index (BMI) and physical activity.

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM·2013
Same author

From medical records to clinical science.

The Permanente journal·2012
Same journal

<i>Integrative Medicine Reports</i>: A New Journal in the Mary Ann Liebert Publications Portfolio.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

Turning Point: A Review of Key Research and Engagement in 2021.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

Nourishing Children's Minds and Bodies.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

Information Technology and Integrative Medicine: Intimate Enemies or In-Team Mates?

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

Beyond the Standard of Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of an Implemented Integrative Therapeutic Care Program in a Brazilian Pediatric Oncology Unit.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

<i>Retraction of:</i> "Music Therapy: A Core Service in Integrative Palliative Care" (doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0025).

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2021
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Randomization does not guarantee balance in clinical trials. Design-adaptive allocations offer superior balance for participants, especially in small or complex studies, improving research reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Randomization is widely accepted as the gold standard for participant allocation in biomedical studies.
  • The primary justification for randomization is its purported ability to ensure balance across all known and unknown prognostic factors.
  • This perceived guarantee of balance is crucial for the validity of treatment effect estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the justification for randomization as the sole method for ensuring group balance.
  • To introduce and advocate for design-adaptive allocations as a superior alternative to randomization.
  • To highlight the benefits of design-adaptive allocations in specific study contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Simple arguments and logical reasoning are used to demonstrate the flaws in the justification for randomization.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Design-adaptive allocation methods are presented as practical and effective alternatives.
  • The performance of design-adaptive allocations is compared to randomization in terms of achieving balance.

    • Main Results:

    • The justification that randomization guarantees balance for all factors is shown to be false and misleading.
    • Design-adaptive allocations are demonstrated to virtually guarantee better balance than randomization.
    • The risk of severe imbalance in randomized studies, particularly in smaller or complex trials, is non-trivial.

    Conclusions:

    • Design-adaptive allocations offer a more reliable method for achieving participant balance in clinical studies.
    • These methods are particularly advantageous in small studies, those with subgroup analyses, or numerous prognostic factors.
    • Design-adaptive allocation is a valuable strategy for complementary and alternative medicine research, where resources are limited and study power is critical.