Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing II: means.

Richard Tello1, Philip E Crewson

  • 1Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 88 E Newton St, Atrium 2, Boston, MA 02118, USA. tello@alum.mit.edu

Radiology
|March 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new approach for SSVEP detection using PARAFAC and canonical correlation analysis.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2016
Same author

Observer performance in assessing anemia on thoracic CT.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2005
Same author

Gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography of the abdomen: feasibility and limitations.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2005
Same author

Reader agreement studies.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2005
Same author

Presence of a yolk sac on transvaginal sonography is the most reliable predictor of single-dose methotrexate treatment failure in ectopic pregnancy.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine·2005
Same author

Accessory renal arteries are not related to hypertension risk: a review of MR angiography data.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2004
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

This article explains statistical tests for comparing means, including t-tests and analysis of variance. Understanding these methods is crucial for interpreting continuous data and determining statistical significance in research.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Statistical significance testing is essential when reporting means in scientific literature.
  • T-tests are commonly used to compare two sample means, assessing differences between populations.
  • Paired t-tests analyze means from the same subjects before and after interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the principles of statistical analysis for continuous data.
  • To guide readers in the radiology literature on appropriate statistical methods.
  • To explain the application of t-tests, Bonferroni correction, and multivariate analysis of variance.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of unpaired t-tests for independent samples.
  • Explanation of paired t-tests for related samples.
  • Overview of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple group comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • T-tests provide statistical significance for differences between two means.
  • Paired t-tests are suitable for pre- and post-intervention comparisons.
  • ANOVA is employed for comparing means across more than two groups.

Conclusions:

  • Appropriate statistical methods are vital for accurate interpretation of research findings.
  • Understanding these statistical techniques enhances the critical appraisal of scientific literature.
  • The article serves as a foundational guide to statistical analysis in radiology.