Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics.

Leena M Hamberg1, James T Rhea, George J Hunter

  • 1Department of Radiology, Perfusion and Physiology Analysis Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Gray Bldg, Rm B238, Boston, MA 02114, USA. lhamberg@partners.org

Radiology
|March 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life Cycle Analysis and Sustainability Opportunities in Radiology.

Radiology·2024
Same author

Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence-enabled Programs in the Clinical Practice of Radiology.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2024
Same author

Building Effective Leadership Development Programs.

Radiology·2024
Same author

Innovation Grants to Advance the Careers of Clinical Radiology Faculty.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2023
Same author

New Approaches to Continuing Medical Education in Radiology in the Era of the Internet and Artificial Intelligence: From "Just in Case" to "Just in Time".

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2023
Same author

The Environmental, Social, Governance Movement and Radiology: Opportunities and Strategy.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2023
Same journal

Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

This study quantifies multi-detector row CT dose characteristics, offering tabulated values and guidelines to minimize patient radiation exposure during CT scans. These findings aid in optimizing imaging protocols for radiation dose reduction.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiological Sciences
  • Diagnostic Radiology

Background:

  • Multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) enables rapid, high-resolution imaging.
  • Optimizing radiation dose in MDCT is crucial for patient safety and diagnostic quality.
  • Understanding dose characteristics informs protocol development and radiation reduction strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the dose characteristics of multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scanners.
  • To provide tabulated dose values and practical guidelines for minimizing radiation dose in MDCT.
  • To establish relationships between technique factors and radiation dose.

Main Methods:

  • Weighted CT dose index (CTDI100w) was measured using standard phantoms across three MDCT scanners.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Dose measurements were performed varying x-ray tube voltage, current, rotation time, and radiation profile width (RPW).
  • Statistical regression analysis characterized CTDI100w as a function of technique factors and acquisition modes.

    • Main Results:

    • CTDI100w demonstrated linear increases with tube current and rotation time in both head and body modes.
    • Normalized CTDI100w showed a power-law relationship with tube voltage, varying between head and body modes.
    • CTDI100w decreased with increasing RPW and showed deviations from manufacturer-suggested values, particularly when deposited power exceeded 24 kW.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides comprehensive dose data for MDCT across various parameters.
    • Tabulated dose values and rules of thumb are presented to aid in radiation dose optimization.
    • Implementation of these findings facilitates radiation dose-efficient MDCT studies.