Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Late-presenting appendicitis: a laparoscopic approach to a complicated problem.

G J Gibeily1, M N Ross, D B Manning

  • 1Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ggibeily@aol.com

Surgical Endoscopy
|March 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the patient perspective after ventral hernia repair.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2019
Same author

Risk factors and possible mechanisms of intravenous port catheter migration.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2012
Same author

Blood-brain barrier impairment with enhanced SP, NK-1R, GFAP and claudin-5 expressions in experimental cerebral toxocariasis.

Parasite immunology·2008
Same author

Administration of 5-androstenediol to mice: pharmacokinetics and cytokine gene expression.

Experimental and molecular pathology·2008
Same author

KCNQ channels mediate IKs, a slow K+ current regulating excitability in the rat node of Ranvier.

The Journal of physiology·2006
Same author

Sero-epidemiology of Toxocara canis infection among aboriginal schoolchildren in the mountainous areas of north-eastern Taiwan.

Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology·2005
Same journal

Disparities in robot utilization in colorectal surgery: the widening gap.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Ergonomic impact of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton on surgeon workload during laparoscopic tasks: a crossover experimental study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

SAGES systematic review and meta-analysis for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based automatic identification model of main pancreatic duct in intraoperative ultrasonography.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Weight matters: long-term evaluation of weight regain and fistula recurrence post endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE).

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Mid-to-long-term follow-up study on the application of cystic duct patency test and cystic duct exploration in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for calculous cholecystitis: Xinjiang-Gu laparoscopic cystic duct exploration.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Interval laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe option for appendiceal mass, offering a quicker return to activities compared to immediate surgery. This approach allows for planned procedures under controlled conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Gastroenterology
  • Abdominal Surgery
  • Laparoscopic Procedures

Background:

  • Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in the US.
  • Appendiceal mass can present as a delayed complication of appendicitis.
  • Current management often involves immediate appendectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interval laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • To compare interval appendectomy with immediate appendectomy for appendiceal mass.
  • To assess patient recovery and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 32 patients with appendiceal mass over 5 years.
  • Group 1: 17 patients with initial nonoperative treatment followed by interval laparoscopic appendectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Group 2: 15 patients with immediate appendectomy.

    • Main Results:

    • All patients in the interval group improved with initial nonoperative treatment.
    • Operative time and complication rates were similar between groups.
    • Patients undergoing interval appendectomy had a significantly faster return to baseline activities (p ≤ 0.02).

    Conclusions:

    • Interval laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective treatment for appendiceal mass.
    • This approach allows for better diagnostic evaluation and planned surgery.
    • It offers a faster recovery compared to immediate appendectomy.