Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Against Popperized epidemiology.

M Jacobsen

    International Journal of Epidemiology
    |March 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Epidemiologists should critically evaluate adopting Popper's philosophy, as its rejection of inductive reasoning may harm the field. Understanding inductive reasoning and statistical inference is crucial for accurate epidemiological function.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Immune response against TB and non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease.

    The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2021
    Same author

    Imaging-based characterization of convective tissue properties.

    International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group·2021
    Same author

    Erratum: "A microfluidic chip based model for the study of full thickness human intestinal tissue using dual flow" [Biomicrofluidics <b>10</b>, 064101 (2016)].

    Biomicrofluidics·2018
    Same author

    Multiple cytokines for the detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> infection in children with tuberculosis.

    The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2017
    Same author

    A microfluidic chip based model for the study of full thickness human intestinal tissue using dual flow.

    Biomicrofluidics·2016
    Same author

    Spontaneous Pathology and Routine Clinical Pathology Parameters in Aging Beagle Dogs: A Comparison With Adolescent and Young Adults.

    Veterinary pathology·2015
    Same journal

    Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    From the departing Editors in Chief.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Data Resource Profile: Cheeloo Lifespan Electronic-health reseArch Data-library (Cheeloo LEAD).

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    Same journal

    Cohort Profile Update: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort.

    International journal of epidemiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • The application of Karl Popper's philosophy of science in epidemiology is debated.
    • Previous research indicates that key aspects of Popperian thought were present in earlier philosophical works and utilized in epidemiology without discarding inductive reasoning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To dispute the recommendation that epidemiologists adopt Popper's philosophy of science.
    • To highlight the detrimental effects of Popper's critique of inductive methods on epidemiological practice.
    • To clarify the role of inductive reasoning and statistical inference in epidemiology.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and philosophical analysis.
    • Examination of historical use of inductive reasoning in epidemiology.
    • Analysis of logical fallacies in epidemiological reasoning.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Popper's philosophy is not essential for constructive epidemiological work, with its core ideas predating his philosophy.
    • Popper's dismissal of inductive reasoning is considered harmful to the field of epidemiology.
    • A common fallacy involving correlations between three random variables is identified, potentially stemming from confusion between deductive and inductive logic.

    Conclusions:

    • Epidemiologists should not exclusively adopt Popper's philosophy.
    • Inductive reasoning and statistical inference are fundamental to epidemiology and their misunderstanding leads to errors.
    • Clarifying the distinction between deductive and inductive logic is essential for advancing epidemiological understanding and practice.