Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Screening for prostatic cancer].

D Iu Pushkar', A V Govorov, A V Bormotin

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)
    |March 8, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study reviews early prostate cancer diagnostic programs, weighing the pros and cons of screening. It examines current diagnostic methods and suggests improvements for prostatic biopsy techniques.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Use of tamsulosin for a prevention of acute urinary retention in the perioperative period in patients undergoing to surgical procedures].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2023
    Same author

    [HIFU therapy of localized prostate cancer using image-guided robotic HIFU Focal One].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2023
    Same author

    [Biofilm control in urological practice].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2022
    Same author

    [Alpha1-adrenergic blockers therapy and sexual function].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2020
    Same author

    [Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of urethroplasty after failed hypospadias repair].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2020
    Same author

    [Moscow program of early detection and treatment of prostate cancer].

    Problemy sotsial'noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniia i istorii meditsiny·2019
    Same journal

    [Outcomes of Surgical Correction of the Urethra in the Management of Postcoital Cystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    Same journal

    [Use of Longidaza in chronic prostatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    Same journal

    [Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and microbiology of suppurative pyelonephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis, part 1].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    Same journal

    [Endocrine and metabolic changes in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    Same journal

    [Risks of acute kidney injury with intravascular administration of an iodine-containing contrast agent in patients with acute pyelonephritis].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    Same journal

    [Pharmacological treatment of overactive bladder: the potential of anticholinergic therapy].

    Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)·2025
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Oncology
    • Urology
    • Diagnostic Medicine

    Background:

    • Prostate cancer is a significant health concern, necessitating effective early detection strategies.
    • Current screening programs for prostate cancer have both benefits and drawbacks that require careful consideration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the application of early prostate cancer diagnosis programs.
    • To present arguments for and against the implementation of prostate cancer screening.
    • To review existing methods for early prostate cancer detection.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and critical analysis of current prostate cancer screening programs and diagnostic techniques.
    • Discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of early prostate cancer detection.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of established methods for diagnosing prostate cancer.
  • Main Results:

    • The review highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening.
    • Existing diagnostic methods for early prostate cancer detection are detailed.
    • Potential improvements in prostatic biopsy techniques are identified.

    Conclusions:

    • The optimal approach to early prostate cancer diagnosis requires balancing screening benefits against potential harms.
    • Refinement of diagnostic techniques, particularly prostatic biopsy, is crucial for accurate early detection.
    • Further research into refining screening protocols and diagnostic accuracy is warranted.