Related Experiment Videos
Effects of sulfonylureas on K(ATP) channel-dependent vasodilation
Fatima Z G A Cyrino1, Daniel A Bottino, Flavio C Coelho
1Laboratório de Pesquisas em Microcirculaçāo, Pavilhão Reitor Haroldo Lisboa da Cunha, térreo, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524 20550-013, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Introduction:
Sulfonylureas are widely prescribed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Their therapeutic efficacy resides in the ability to bind to sulfonylurea receptors (SURs) present on the beta-cell plasma membrane, to close the ATP-regulated potassium (K(ATP)) channel, and thereby to enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. These receptors are also found in a wide variety of extra-pancreatic tissues such as brain, peripheral nerves, heart, and vascular smooth muscle where they contribute to the regulation of the vascular tone.
Objective:
The objective of the present study was to determine the potency of three sulfonylureas, glibenclamide, gliclazide, and glimepiride, in antagonizing the vasorelaxant action of diazoxide, an ATP-regulated K(+) channel (K(ATP)) opener, in vivo, using the hamster cheek pouch preparation and evaluating the changes in mean internal diameter and blood flow of arterioles and venules.
Material And Methods:
Cheek pouches of anesthetized male hamsters superfused with a HEPES-supported HCO(3)(-)-buffered saline solution were placed under an intravital microscope coupled to a closed-circuit TV system. All substances were applied topically.
Measurements:
Mean arteriolar and venular internal diameters using an image shearing device, red blood cell (RBC) velocity by the dual-slit photometric technique and microvessel volume flow was calculated from diameters and RBC velocities.
Results:
The numbers are given in order, first diameter and then flow, always for the highest concentration of diazoxide tested, by itself or in combination with a given sulfonylurea: (1) diazoxide, used in doses of 0.01, 1, and 100 microM, elicited a dose-dependent dilation and flow increase in arterioles [increase of 52.1% (P<.01) and 41.2% (P<.01)] and venules [37.9% (P<.05) and 57.6% (P<.01)]; (2) glibenclamide (0.81 microM)+diazoxide 29.3% (P=.172) and 25.0% (P=.064) for arterioles and 8% (P=.654) and 3.7% (P=.769) for venules; (3) gliclazide (12 microM)+diazoxide 51.0% (P<.01) and 46.7% (P<.01) for arterioles and 59.0% (P<.01) and 45.2% (P<.01) for venules; (4) glimepiride (0.82 microM)+diazoxide 22.8% (P=.228) and 12.5% (P=.305) for arterioles and 15.6% (P=.415) and 16.0% (P=.291) for venules.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that, in contrast to glibenclamide and glimepiride, therapeutic concentrations of gliclazide produce no cross-reactivity with smooth muscle cell K(ATP) channels in the microvessels of the hamster cheek pouch. Previous studies have confirmed these results in isolated aortic rings of rats and guinea pigs.