Equilibrium and non-equilibrium dynamics of the cranio-mandibular complex and cervical spine
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
G T Gillies1, D W Christy, J M Stenger
1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, PO Box 400746, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746, USA.
Abstract:
A dynamic model of the inverted pendulum characteristics of the head and cervical spine is presented. Using simple approximations and a single rotational-degree-of-freedom approach, the model is shown to conform to the classical mathematical description of an inverted pendulum motion. It also exhibits the well-known point of unstable equilibrium which is a standard property of such systems. Specific predictions of this theoretical description are compared against other values for the tilt, angular velocity and acceleration of the head during acceleration-sled testing, and with the Kapitza relation for mechanical-dither stabilization of an inverted pendulum. Numerical evaluations of the dynamic variables, resonant frequencies and time constants important to the problem are provided, and suggestions are made about how further results might be derived from extended versions of the model. This approach can now be refined to serve as a testing ground for analysing the biomechanics of traumatic neck injuries and for interpreting the possible roles that mandibular dysfunctions and dental malocclusion may play in disorders of the cervical spine. (Some background needed for exploring the latter possibility is presented.)
Related Concept Videos
Stability of Equilibrium Configuration: Problem Solving
Problem-solving in the context of the stability of equilibrium configuration...
Static Equilibrium - II
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - I
Static Equilibrium - I
Oscillations about an Equilibrium Position
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
