Related Experiment Videos
Cell line differences in bacterially translocated ExoS ADP-ribosyltransferase substrate specificity.
Elizabeth A Rucks1, Jennifer E Fraylick1, Lisa M Brandt1
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 165 Ashley Avenue, Suite 309, PO Box 250908, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Microbiology (Reading, England)
|March 8, 2003
Summary
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa utilizes a type III secretory (TTS) system to translocate effector proteins like Exoenzyme S (ExoS) into host cells.
- ExoS is an ADP-ribosyltransferase (ADPRT) that modifies host cell proteins, impacting cellular functions.
- Differences in ExoS activity across various cell types suggest host cell-specific interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential effects of bacterial translocated ExoS on human epithelial versus murine fibroblastic cells.
- To identify the cellular mechanisms underlying variations in ExoS substrate modification.
- To determine if host cell origin influences ExoS ADP-ribosyltransferase activity and its impact on host cell function.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of ExoS functional effects on human epithelial and murine fibroblastic cells.
- Assessment of ExoS-mediated ADP-ribosylation of low-molecular-mass G (LMMG) proteins.
- Investigation of bacterial adherence and ExoS internalization efficiencies.
- Examination of substrate modification patterns across diverse mammalian cell lines (human, simian, rodent).
Main Results:
- Human epithelial cells showed increased sensitivity to ExoS, affecting proliferation, morphology, and re-adherence compared to murine fibroblasts.
- ExoS ADP-ribosylated a broader range of LMMG proteins in human epithelial cells than in murine fibroblasts.
- The differences in substrate modification were not due to variations in bacterial adherence or ExoS internalization.
- Rodent cell lines consistently displayed limited LMMG protein ADP-ribosylation, while human and simian cells showed more extensive modification.
- Substrate modification patterns were independent of cellular transformation and cell type.
Conclusions:
- Eukaryotic cell properties, particularly those related to animal origin, significantly influence ExoS substrate targeting by its ADPRT activity.
- Host cell-specific interactions dictate the extent of ExoS-mediated protein modification.
- These variations in substrate modification impact the severity of ExoS effects on host cell functions, highlighting the importance of host-pathogen interactions in disease pathogenesis.