Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Isometric and Eccentric Force Generation Assessment of Skeletal Muscles Isolated from Murine Models of Muscular Dystrophies
Published on: January 31, 2013
Surface electromyograms of agonist and antagonist muscles during force development of maximal isometric
Ridha Sahaly1, Henry Vandewalle, Tarak Driss
1Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail et du Sport, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, 91 bd de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Surface integrated electromyograms (iEMG) of agonist and antagonist muscles were studied during the rising phase of maximal isometric efforts (elbow flexion, unilateral and bilateral leg extension) to explain the difference in maximal rate of force development (MRFD) with a hard-and-fast instruction (instruction I) and a fast instruction (instruction II ). Force and EMG were simultaneously recorded in 24 athletes and iEMG were computed at MRFD and during different phases of force development (P(0-25), P(25-50), P(50-75), P(75-90) and P(90-100)). A two-way ANOVA for repeated measures (muscle x instruction) showed that the value of iEMG at MRFD was significantly higher with instruction II for elbow flexion, unilateral and bilateral leg press exercises (F>4.9; P<0.04). The effect of instruction upon iEMG of the agonist muscles corresponding to the different phases of the force development was significant for elbow flexion (F=4.2; P<0.05 ) unilateral (F>6.4; P<0.02) and bilateral leg extension (F>9 and P<0.006 for soleus and vastus lateralis; but F=3.2 and P=0.08 for vastus medialis). There was a significant interaction between instruction and phase of force development (F>2.6; P<0.05 ): iEMG was significantly higher with instruction II at the beginning of force development (P(0-25)) for all the muscles (except the soleus muscle during the bilateral leg exercise) but not at higher force (P(75-90) and P(90-100)). The steeper force development with instruction II can be explained by the better activation of the agonist muscles at the beginning of force development. A lower co-activation of the antagonist muscles does not explain the improvement in MRFD as the iEMG of the antagonist muscles was not lower with instruction II but was proportional to the activation level of the agonist muscle.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.
Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles
Like neurons, muscle cells are also regarded as excitable due to their capacity to change in response to stimuli, primarily due to voltage-gated ion channels embedded in their plasma membranes, which get activated by alterations in the cell's...

