Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The single joint expert.

Alec Samuels, J P Barrister

    Medicine, Science, and the Law
    |March 12, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The single joint expert (SJE) is a new civil litigation concept. This analysis explores its advantages, disadvantages, and evolving practical applications in legal proceedings.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Suicide and coronial problems.

    The Medico-legal journal·2022
    Same author

    Obstetrics and gynaecology and the law.

    The Medico-legal journal·2022
    Same author

    Forensic Science Regulator: The Forensic Science Regulator Act 2021.

    The Medico-legal journal·2022
    Same author

    A new wrinkle in Montgomery? The surgeon faces the unexpected.

    The Medico-legal journal·2022
    Same author

    Assisted dying.

    The Medico-legal journal·2022
    Same author

    Andrew Malkinson: A miscarriage of justice?

    Medicine, science, and the law·2021
    Same journal

    Characteristics of child physical abuse cases that are referred by the police for a clinical forensic medical examination.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    Same journal

    Cost- and time-effectiveness of medico-legal management of healthcare-related infections: A bicentric comparative study.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    Same journal

    The right to die: A comparative analysis of end-of-life issues in Scandinavian legal systems.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    Same journal

    Diagnosing autism in adult forensic settings.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    Same journal

    Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    Same journal

    Changing patterns in volatile substance abuse fatalities: A retrospective case series from Northern Australia.

    Medicine, science, and the law·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Civil Litigation
    • Legal Practice
    • Expert Evidence

    Background:

    • The traditional approach to expert evidence in civil litigation involves each party appointing their own expert.
    • This can lead to adversarial expert testimony and increased costs.
    • The concept of the single joint expert (SJE) has emerged as a potential alternative.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the merits and demerits of the single joint expert (SJE) in civil litigation.
    • To identify and analyze the practical changes and emerging trends associated with the implementation of SJEs.
    • To determine whether the SJE is a beneficial or detrimental development in the legal landscape.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature on expert evidence and civil procedure.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of case law pertaining to the use and effectiveness of SJEs.
  • Examination of emerging practices and judicial commentary on SJE implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • SJEs can potentially reduce costs and streamline proceedings by avoiding duplicative expert evidence.
    • However, concerns exist regarding the expert's true independence and the potential for bias.
    • Emerging practices show varied judicial approaches to SJE appointment and management.

    Conclusions:

    • The single joint expert (SJE) presents a mixed bag of benefits and drawbacks in civil litigation.
    • Its effectiveness is contingent on careful case management and judicial oversight.
    • Further observation is needed to fully ascertain the long-term impact of SJEs on legal practice and justice.