Covariation bias in the affect-modulated startle paradigm
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Paul Pauli1, Oliver Diedrich, Anja Müller
1Department of Psychology, Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Würzburg, Germany. pauli@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Abstract:
A covariation bias (CB) reflects the overestimation of an objectively random covariation between fear-relevant picture stimuli (e.g., spiders) and aversive consequences (e.g., electric shocks). The affect-modulated startle (AMS) paradigm is similar to it because aversive reflex probes are delivered in the context of unpleasant, neutral or pleasant picture stimuli. The present study explored if a covariation bias is present in the affect-modulated startle paradigm. There was a covariation bias for unpleasant and pleasant compared to neutral pictures probably due to differences in arousal. Startle reflexes were modulated by picture valence. No correlation between a covariation bias index and the startle response modulation was found. It is concluded that both phenomena are mediated by different underlying mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Motivational Bias
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences physiological...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Cause and Effect
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

