Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Board's missing link.

Cynthia A Montgomery1, Rhonda Kaufman

  • 1Harvard Business School, Boston, USA.

Harvard Business Review
|March 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Corporate governance issues stem from flawed shareholder-director relationships, not superficial fixes. Addressing structural weaknesses in accountability and information exchange is crucial for lasting improvements in corporate oversight.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-dose effects of isosorbide mononitrate alone or in combination with losartan on central blood pressure.

Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH·2010
Same author

Quantitative magnetic resonance fat measurements in humans correlate with established methods but are biased.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2010
Same author

Putting leadership back into strategy.

Harvard business review·2008
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Business
  • Economics
  • Law

Background:

  • Current corporate governance practices often address symptoms rather than root causes.
  • Flaws in the foundational relationships within a company undermine systemic equilibrium.
  • The shareholder-director relationship is particularly weak, hindering effective checks and balances.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify structural weaknesses in corporate governance, specifically between shareholders and directors.
  • To propose solutions for improving the relationship and accountability between shareholders and boards.
  • To advocate for a systemic approach to corporate governance reform.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the information exchange dynamics between shareholders and directors.
  • Examination of director accountability and shareholder influence mechanisms.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing corporate governance structures and their limitations.

    • Main Results:

    • Poor information flow exists between shareholders and directors.
    • Directors lack individual accountability to shareholders.
    • Shareholders have limited influence over board composition and decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Superficial fixes are insufficient; structural reforms are necessary for effective corporate governance.
    • Enhancing board accountability, separating CEO/Chair roles, and empowering shareholders are key recommendations.
    • Addressing the flawed shareholder-director relationship is vital for systemic stability and improved oversight.