Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The nature of cognitive development.

Scott P. Johnson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Uris Hall, Cornell University, 14850, Ithaca, NY, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|March 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive development theories, including constructivism and nativism, are debated. A modern constructivist view is gaining traction due to its enhanced psychophysical, computational, and neural plausibility.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

What consciousness is should be determined empirically, not a priori.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Is AI making us stupid?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Clarifications about there being two necessary conditions for consciousness.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Positive appraisal style as a key factor in stress resilience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Does reframing access and phenomenality advance consciousness science?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

In defense of a distinction.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Historical debates in cognitive development theories often lacked empirical evidence.
  • Piagetian constructivism emphasized infant self-directed action.
  • Nativist theories proposed cognitive precocity but left developmental mechanisms unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate constructivist theories of cognitive development.
  • To highlight the renewed plausibility of constructivism.
  • To bridge theoretical arguments with empirical evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and contemporary constructivist and nativist theories.
  • Analysis of psychophysical, computational, and neural evidence supporting cognitive development models.
  • Integration of developmental psychology principles with modern scientific approaches.

Main Results:

  • A new perspective on constructivism offers greater psychophysical, computational, and neural grounding.
  • This revitalized constructivist approach addresses limitations of previous theories.
  • Evidence suggests a more nuanced understanding of cognitive development mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • The contemporary view of constructivism presents a more robust framework for understanding cognitive development.
  • This updated theory integrates diverse scientific evidence.
  • Further research is warranted to explore the implications of this new constructivist paradigm.

Related Experiment Videos