Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

James Neel and the doubling dose concept.

Mary F Lyon1

  • 1MRC Mammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell, Didcot OX11 0RD, UK. m.lyon@har.mrc.ac.uk

Mutation Research
|March 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The doubling dose (DD) concept helps assess human genetic radiation risks. However, studies show different DD values apply to different genetic endpoints, challenging earlier assumptions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do LINEs have a role in X-chromosome inactivation?

Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology·2006
Same author

Elucidating mouse transmission ratio distortion.

Nature genetics·2005
Same author

No longer 'all-or-none'.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2005
Same author

Activating calcium-sensing receptor mutation in the mouse is associated with cataracts and ectopic calcification.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2004
Same author

The Lyon and the LINE hypothesis.

Seminars in cell & developmental biology·2004
Same author

Transmission ratio distortion in mice.

Annual review of genetics·2003

Area of Science:

  • Human genetics
  • Radiation biology
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • The doubling dose (DD) is a key metric for evaluating genetic risks from radiation exposure in humans.
  • Historically, it was assumed that DD values derived from mouse specific locus experiments were directly applicable to human populations.

Discussion:

  • James Neel's research on atomic bomb survivors revealed that a single DD value is insufficient.
  • Different genetic endpoints yield varying DD estimates, indicating a more complex relationship between radiation and genetic mutation.

Key Insights:

  • The direct extrapolation of mouse-derived doubling dose values to humans is not scientifically valid.
  • Genetic risk assessment in humans requires considering specific endpoints and their unique responses to radiation.

Outlook:

  • Future research should focus on refining DD estimates for diverse human genetic endpoints.
  • Developing more precise models for human radiation genetic risk assessment is crucial.

Related Experiment Videos