Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic certainty is sometimes certainly an error.

Elliott Foucar1

  • 1Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Parkland Health and Hospital Systems, Dallas, TX, USA.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|March 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Role of Cue-Based Strategies in Skilled Diagnosis Among Pathologists.

Human factors·2021
Same author

DCIS and invasive interval breast cancer.

The Lancet. Oncology·2016
Same author

Pathologic Abnormalities Behind Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Terminology.

JAMA oncology·2016
Same author

Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer.

The Lancet. Oncology·2014
Same author

The pathologist in tortland: when is ignorance about "med-mal" rational, when is it unavoidable, and when is it a problem to be corrected?

American journal of clinical pathology·2014
Same author

Case 8-2013: A woman with carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The New England journal of medicine·2013
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

A new method for separating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subclasses, polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis (PTGE), is precise and correlates well with the reference method. This simpler, cost-effective PTGE is suitable for clinical labs.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Assessing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions is crucial for cardiovascular risk stratification.
  • Polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PGGE-REF) is the established reference method for LDL subfraction analysis.
  • The need for simpler, more accessible methods for routine clinical laboratory use is evident.

Discussion:

  • Polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis (PTGE) demonstrates high precision with excellent intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation (<4%).
  • LDL subclass distribution significantly correlates with triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL ratio, and non-HDL cholesterol levels.
  • A predominant distribution of large LDL was observed in subjects with low TG levels (<150 mg/dL), while small LDL predominated in those with high TG levels (>200 mg/dL).

Related Experiment Videos

Key Insights:

  • PTGE shows excellent agreement with PGGE-REF (weighted kappa = 0.78).
  • High concordance was observed between PTGE and PGGE-REF for classifying LDL subclasses, with minimal misclassification.
  • PTGE correctly identified 92% of small, dense LDL samples identified by PGGE-REF.

Outlook:

  • The PTGE method offers a precise, reliable, and cost-effective alternative to PGGE-REF for LDL subfraction analysis.
  • Its simplicity and suitability for clinical laboratories position PTGE for wider adoption in routine cardiovascular risk assessment.
  • Further validation in diverse clinical populations may enhance the clinical utility of PTGE for personalized medicine.