Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
New frontiers and unresolved controversies in percutaneous coronary intervention
1Interventional Cardiology Program, Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. vlad.dzavik@uhn.on.ca
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers benefits for acute coronary syndromes but lacks conclusive evidence for improved survival in stable coronary artery disease compared to optimal medical therapy. Further research is needed for new technologies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a primary treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Evidence supporting PCI's survival benefit over optimal medical therapy is limited, except in acute coronary syndromes.
- Surgical revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting) has historically shown superiority in stable disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence on the efficacy of PCI across different coronary artery disease settings.
- To evaluate the role of PCI in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes.
- To highlight the need for further research on new technologies and their integration into clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized controlled trials and clinical trial data.
- Comparison of PCI outcomes with optimal medical therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Analysis of emerging technologies and their potential impact.
Main Results:
- PCI shows benefit in acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
- In stable coronary artery disease, PCI may offer symptom relief and reduce repeat interventions but not necessarily improve survival compared to surgery.
- The benefit of opening late occluded arteries after myocardial infarction is not well-established.
- New devices like drug-eluting stents and thrombectomy devices show promise but require more robust evidence.
Conclusions:
- PCI is effective for acute coronary syndromes but its role in stable coronary artery disease requires further clarification.
- Optimal medical therapy remains a crucial component of care for stable coronary artery disease.
- Continued research and collaboration are essential to validate new PCI technologies and optimize patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a key modality of therapy of patients with coronary artery disease. However, with the exception of acute coronary syndromes, there is as yet no conclusive evidence from randomized controlled trials that PCI improves survival and outcome compared with optimal medical therapy. Randomized trials comparing PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with stable coronary artery disease conducted before stenting showed superiority of the surgical approach. Early results from stent trials continue to indicate better symptom relief and less need for repeat intervention with the surgical approach, although myocardial infarction and mortality are similar with the 2 revascularization modalities. In the setting of acute coronary syndromes, however, recent trials suggest superiority of an aggressive approach, including PCI, compared with a conservative strategy of medical therapy only. This benefit extends to patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, including those with shock. In the latter setting, mortality remains high and novel approaches to protect myocardial metabolism and improve perfusion will be needed to further improve survival. The role of revascularization in patients with completed myocardial infarction and persistently occluded arteries is much less clear. Although the late open artery hypothesis is widely accepted and interventional cardiologists routinely open late infarct-related coronary occlusions, the available evidence to justify this strategy is weak. New devices, such as thrombectomy devices in thrombus-laden lesions and drug-eluting stents, offer promise, although all lack the degree of proof of benefit and safety typically required of new pharmaceutical agents. As new technologies and therapies with the potential to improve outcomes and decelerate the atherosclerotic process are developed, it will be important for investigators and industry to collaborate in incorporating these advances into ongoing and new trials testing the efficacy of PCI in all settings.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care