Related Experiment Videos
Influence of PMEA-coated bypass circuits on perioperative inflammatory response
Mikio Ninomiya1, Kagami Miyaji, Shinichi Takamoto
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. mikio-ninomiya@par.odn.ne.jp
Background:
Poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several experimental studies have revealed excellent biocompatibility of PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. The clinical utility of the PMEA-coated circuits was compared with that of uncoated circuits, focusing on perioperative inflammatory response.
Methods:
Twenty-two patients were randomized to PMEA-coated (group P; Capiox RX25; n = 11) or uncoated (group U; Capiox SX10; n = 11) circuit group, and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve operations. The following markers, as well as clinical outcomes, were analyzed perioperatively: (a) complement activation by C3a (including C3a-desArg) concentrations; (b) leukocyte activation by polymorphonuclear-elastase concentrations; (c) acute phase inflammatory response by interleukin-6 concentrations; and (d) platelet preservation by number of platelets.
Results:
The maximal values of C3a and polymorphonuclear-elastase were significantly lower in group P than in group U. The intergroup difference of interleukin-6 was not significant. Although preservation of platelets was significantly better in group P until 1 hour after initiating cardiopulmonary bypass, no significant intergroup difference was observed thereafter. The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation revealed no significant intergroup difference.
Conclusions:
The PMEA-coated circuits exhibited better suppression of perioperative complement and leukocyte activation than the uncoated circuits. In addition, the price of the PMEA-coated circuits is the same as that of the uncoated circuits. Therefore, we judged that the clinical utility of the PMEA-coated circuits is superior to those of the uncoated circuits.