Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Sexual harassment stories: testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation
Jill E Huntley1, Mark Costanzo
1Department of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College, 850 Columbia Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA.
Abstract:
The story model of juror decision-making proposes that jurors use personal experience and information presented at trial to create stories that guide their verdicts. This model has received strong empirical support in studies using criminal cases. The research presented here extends the story model to civil litigation and tests a story-mediated model against an unmediated model of jury decision-making. In Phase 1, content analysis of mock juror responses to 4 realistic sexual harassment cases revealed prototypic plaintiff and defense stories. In Phase 2, these prototypic stories were included as mediators in a model predicting verdicts in 4 additional sexual harassment cases. Mock juror attitudes, experiences, and demographics were assessed, then attorneys presented abbreviated versions of 4 actual sexual harassment cases. Path analyses provided support for the story-mediated model, which added significantly to the amount of variance accounted for in the outcome measures of verdict, commitment to verdict, and confidence times verdict. Implications for sexual harassment and other types of civil cases are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Stereotype Content Model
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Halo Effect
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
