Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

No human cloning: a social ethics perspective.

L S Cahill1

  • 1Boston College, USA.

Hofstra Law Review
|March 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peripheral cord insertion is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome only when accompanied by clinically significant placental pathology.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2023
Same author

In response to the Letter to the Editor by Romach et al. re our publication "Dolutegravir in pregnant mice is associated with increased rates of fetal defects at therapeutic but not at supratherapeutic levels".

EBioMedicine·2021
Same author

Determination of fetal heart rate short-term variation from umbilical artery Doppler waveforms.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2020
Same author

Altered brain development in an early-onset murine model of Alzheimer's disease.

Neurobiology of aging·2014
Same author

(7)Li NMR and two-dimensional exchange study of lithium dynamics in monoclinic Li(3)V(2)(PO(4))(3).

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2006
Same author

Catholic consensus on critical cae, patient welfare and the common good.

Christian bioethics·2002
Same journal

Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life.

Hofstra law review·2005
Same journal

Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.

Hofstra law review·2004
Same journal

The contraception misconception: why prescription contraceptives should be covered by employer insurance plans.

Hofstra law review·2004
Same journal

Security interests in human materials.

Hofstra law review·2003
Same journal

A woman's right to choose: designation of fetal tissue donees.

Hofstra law review·2003
Same journal

Reflections on human cloning.

Hofstra law review·2003
See all related articles

Human cloning negatively impacts families and exploits socioeconomic disparities. This essay advocates for an international prohibition of cloning, exploring ethical arguments and religious perspectives in public discourse.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Sociology
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • The ethical implications of human cloning remain a contentious issue.
  • Socioeconomic factors can influence the development and accessibility of advanced reproductive technologies.
  • The role of moral and religious arguments in shaping public policy is significant.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the detrimental effects of human cloning on family structures.
  • To examine how market incentives for cloning exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities.
  • To propose international prohibition of human cloning and explore implementation strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical inquiry into moral arguments.
  • Socioeconomic analysis of market incentives in biotechnology.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionNational Bioethics Advisory Commission

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of international policy and regulatory frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Human cloning poses a significant threat to traditional family concepts.
    • Market-driven cloning technologies are likely to widen the gap between socioeconomic groups.
    • International consensus and legal prohibition are necessary to mitigate risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Human cloning should be prohibited globally due to its negative impact on family and society.
    • Ethical considerations, including religious viewpoints, are crucial in public debate on cloning.
    • Policy-making must address the socioeconomic consequences of emerging biotechnologies.