Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practices differentiating high-performing from low-performing supported employment programs.

Elizabeth L Gowdy1, Linda S Carlson, Charles A Rapp

  • 1State of Kansas Department of Social Rehabilitation Services, USA.

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
|March 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consumer Outcomes After Implementing CommonGround as an Approach to Shared Decision Making.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2016
Same author

Implementing CommonGround in a community mental health center: Lessons in a computerized decision support system.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2016
Same author

Enhanced consumer goal achievement through strengths-based group supervision.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2014
Same author

The perceptions of supervisory support scale.

Administration and policy in mental health·2013
Same author

Advances in fidelity measurement for mental health services research: four measures.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2012
Same author

Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes.

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·2012
Same journal

Capturing lived experience of recovery-oriented mental health care: Psychometric validation of the French Recovery Self-Assessment Scale (RSAR-Fr).

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
Same journal

Demographic covariates, vocational rehabilitation services, and job retention of people with mental health conditions: A hierarchical logistic regression analysis.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
Same journal

Predictors of competitive employment among people offered individual placement and support supported employment.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
Same journal

Employment and industries that low-income U.S. veterans with mental illness participate in.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
Same journal

Behavioral health provider training to enhance family partnerships.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
Same journal

Fostering insight among individuals with psychosis through dialogic reading.

Psychiatric rehabilitation journal·2026
See all related articles

This study identified 13 key practices differentiating successful employment programs. These strategies focus on building consumer interest, job acquisition, and job retention for competitive employment outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Vocational Rehabilitation
  • Employment Services
  • Disability Studies

Background:

  • Competitive employment is a primary goal for many individuals with disabilities.
  • Variability exists in program effectiveness for achieving competitive employment.
  • Identifying differentiating practices is crucial for improving service delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To qualitatively explore practices distinguishing high-performing employment programs from low-performing ones.
  • To identify specific factors contributing to successful competitive employment outcomes.
  • To compare study findings with existing "best practice" definitions.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study design.
  • Comparative analysis of programs with high versus low competitive employment rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of differentiating practice factors.

    • Main Results:

    • 13 differentiating practice factors were identified.
    • Factors clustered into three core areas: building consumer interest in work, job acquisition, and job maintenance.
    • These factors provide actionable insights for program improvement.

    Conclusions:

    • Specific, identifiable practices significantly impact program success in competitive employment.
    • Findings align with and potentially refine current "best practice" standards in vocational rehabilitation.
    • Implementing these 13 factors can enhance program effectiveness and employment outcomes.