Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

How to (or not to) communicate science.

S P R Rose1

  • 1Brain and Behaviour Research Group, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, U.K. s.p.r.rose@open.ac.uk

Biochemical Society Transactions
|March 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Commentary on Baverstock; the gene; an appraisal.

Progress in biophysics and molecular biology·2023
Same author

Temporal effects of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate on memory formation in day-old chicks.

Neuroscience·2007
Same author

The peptide sequence Arg-Glu-Arg, present in the amyloid precursor protein, protects against memory loss caused by A beta and acts as a cognitive enhancer.

The European journal of neuroscience·2004
Same author

Communication: from neurons to people; from present to future.

Biochemical Society transactions·2003
Same author

Dehydroepiandosterone and its sulphate enhance memory retention in day-old chicks.

Neuroscience·2002
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Scientists must understand the public, not just communicate science to them. Uncritical presentations of science, often from biased sources, fuel public mistrust, but art can bridge this gap.

Area of Science:

  • Science communication
  • Public understanding of science
  • Neuroscience and genetics

Background:

  • Current science communication often presents a biased, uncritical view of scientific progress.
  • This approach, originating from researchers and institutions, fosters public mistrust in fields like genetics and neuroscience.

Discussion:

  • Effective science communication requires scientists to understand public perspectives.
  • Media misrepresentations often stem from initial press releases by scientists and institutions.
  • Popular science communication frequently overlooks the contributions of diverse groups, perpetuating a narrow view of scientific discovery.

Key Insights:

  • A one-sided approach to science communication erodes public trust.
  • The origins of scientific information, including press releases, significantly impact public perception.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bridging the gap between science and the public necessitates mutual understanding.

    • Outlook:

    • Integrating natural sciences into art forms like theatre and literature can reduce cultural fragmentation.
    • Exploring diverse narratives in science communication can enhance public engagement and trust.
    • Fostering a more inclusive and critical dialogue about science is essential for societal progress.