Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of array-processing algorithms for a headband hearing aid.

Julie E Greenberg1, Joseph G Desloge, Patrick M Zurek

  • 1Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. jgreenbe@mit.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing a dominance-region hypothesis for interaural time discrimination using off-frequency maskers.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Investigating the Utility of a Compact Loudspeaker Array for Audiometric Testing.

American journal of audiology·2024
Same author

Robustness of an Adaptive Beamforming Method for Hearing Aids.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
Same author

A method for degrading sound localization while preserving binaural advantages for speech reception in noise.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2019
Same author

Can monaural temporal masking explain the ongoing precedence effect?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2018
Same author

Strength of onset and ongoing cues in judgments of lateral position.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2017
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Adaptive microphone arrays significantly improve speech reception for hearing aid users. These advanced hearing aid technologies offer better sound clarity in noisy environments, enhancing daily communication.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Signal Processing
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • Hearing aids often struggle to isolate speech in noisy environments.
  • Existing directional microphone systems offer limited noise reduction capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various array-processing algorithms for hearing aids.
  • To compare adaptive and fixed array algorithms against a binaural directional microphone reference.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation and evaluation of two adaptive and one fixed array-processing algorithm.
  • Testing with experienced hearing aid users in conditions with one and three noise sources.
  • Measurement of speech reception thresholds and subjective ease-of-listening ratings.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The fixed algorithm improved speech reception thresholds by 2 dB.
  • Adaptive algorithms yielded a 7-9 dB improvement over the reference condition.
  • Subjects generally preferred all array-processing algorithms for ease-of-listening.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive array-processing algorithms show significant potential for enhancing hearing aid performance.
  • Further evaluation in realistic acoustic environments is recommended for these adaptive algorithms.