Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Carbon management and biodiversity.

Michael A Huston¹, Gregg Marland

¹Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37831-6335, USA. hustonma@ornl.gov

Journal of Environmental Management

|March 28, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Tracking unaccounted greenhouse gas emissions due to the war in Ukraine since 2022.

The Science of the total environment·2024

Same author

Optimizing sequestered carbon in forest offset programs: balancing accounting stringency and participation.

Carbon balance and management·2019

Same author

Per capita carbon emissions must fall to 1955 levels.

Nature·2019

Same author

Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity.

Oecologia·2017

Same author

Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China.

Nature·2015

Same author

GDP: No one metric can rule them all.

Nature·2014

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Incentives for land use changes can reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide by storing carbon in forests or using biomass fuels. Careful planning is crucial to balance carbon goals with biodiversity preservation.

Area of Science:

Climate change mitigation
Land use management
Carbon cycle dynamics

Background:

International climate change mitigation strategies consider land-based incentives to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Key land-based activities include terrestrial carbon sequestration and biomass fuel substitution for fossil fuels.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the differing land requirements and biodiversity implications of carbon sequestration versus biomass fuel systems.
To identify potential conflicts and synergies between carbon dioxide reduction and biodiversity preservation through land-use planning.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of land requirements for carbon sequestration in forests versus intensive biomass production.
Assessment of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services under different land-use scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

Consideration of socio-political factors in global land-use planning for climate mitigation.

Main Results:

Carbon sequestration in low-productivity lands (e.g., forests) is compatible with biodiversity preservation.
Intensive biomass production requires productive land, potentially competing with agriculture or encroaching on biodiversity-rich areas.
Achieving both carbon reduction and biodiversity goals necessitates careful planning to avoid negative trade-offs.

Conclusions:

Win-win solutions for climate mitigation and biodiversity are achievable but require meticulous evaluation.
Land-use planning must account for varying land productivities and potential conflicts between carbon and biodiversity objectives.
Political and equity considerations complicate global implementation of land-based climate mitigation strategies.