Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing the methodological quality of nonrandomized intervention studies.

L Duncan Saunders1, G Mustafa Soomro, Jeanette Buckingham

  • 1University of Alberta, Canada.

Western Journal of Nursing Research
|April 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary

When randomized controlled trials are unavailable, decision-makers use nonrandomized studies (NRS). This review found existing quality assessment tools for NRS vary widely and recommends further research into specific methodological characteristics associated with bias.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine learning derived abdominal aortic calcification is associated with physical frailty in community-dwelling adults: the UK Biobank Imaging Study.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS): addressing methodological and geographical barriers to inform global public health guidelines, interventions and precision medicine.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

A measurement comparability study to support instrument harmonization in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Associations between modifiable lifestyle risk factors and abdominal aortic calcification in the UK Biobank Imaging Study.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2026
Same author

An explainable machine learning approach to predict fragility fractures and the identification of important features.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The effect of timing of physical exercise on glycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention studies.

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders·2026

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for intervention effectiveness but are often unavailable.
  • Decision-makers frequently rely on nonrandomized studies (NRS) when RCTs are lacking.
  • Assessing the quality of NRS is crucial for reliable healthcare decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and describe existing instruments for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies (NRS) of healthcare interventions.
  • To evaluate the characteristics and developmental rigor of these quality assessment instruments.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a Medline search for English-language articles.
  • Identified and analyzed instruments designed to assess the quality of NRS in healthcare.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined the scope, item content, and developmental rigor of identified instruments.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified instruments for NRS quality assessment varied significantly in scope and design.
    • Commonly included items related to study questions, allocation, group comparability, and blinding.
    • No single generic scale was found to be universally applicable or supported.

    Conclusions:

    • Discourages the development of a generic scale for evaluating the methodological quality of nonrandomized intervention studies.
    • Recommends further research to understand how specific methodological characteristics influence bias in NRS.
    • This will aid researchers in prioritizing methodological evaluations for specific studies.