Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complete solo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience.

P Antiphon1, A Hoznek, A Benyoussef

  • 1Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.

Urology
|April 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved photocatalytic efficiency of Sr<sub>5</sub>Ta<sub>4</sub>O<sub>15</sub> perovskite oxide <i>via</i> V doping and oxygen defects.

RSC advances·2025
Same author

2022 Recommendations of the AFU Lithiasis Committee: Laser - utilization and settings.

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2023
Same author

Prediction of superconductivity in Li, K, Ca, and Sr-intercalated blue phosphorene bilayer using first-principle calculations.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2023
Same author

Theoretical investigation of FAPbSnGeX<sub>3</sub> efficiency.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

First-principles study of <i>closo</i>-dodecaborates M<sub>2</sub>B<sub>12</sub>H<sub>12</sub> (M = Li, Na, K) as solid-state electrolyte materials.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2021
Same author

[Urethro-vesical anastomosis reconstruction using extra-peritoneal robot-assisted laparoscopy for anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2021
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Extended versus Standard Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Intractable Epistaxis and Severe Hypertension in a Young Woman.

Urology·2026
Same journal

A 53-Year-Old Man with Elevated PSA and a Cystic Pelvic Lesion.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Low-Grade, Papillary Bladder Tumors A plea for in-office fulguration.

Urology·2026
See all related articles

Complete solo (CS) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is feasible, offering comparable outcomes to standard LRP. This robotic approach enhances surgeon comfort and provides economic benefits by reducing the need for human assistance.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer.
  • Human assistants are typically required for laparoscope manipulation and retraction during LRP.
  • The feasibility of a completely solo (CS) LRP, with robotic assistance for the laparoscope, has not been fully established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the feasibility of CS LRP performed solely with robotic manipulation of the laparoscope.
  • To compare CS LRP with the standard LRP technique, identifying advantages and drawbacks.

Main Methods:

  • Sixteen consecutive patients undergoing CS LRP were compared with 16 patients undergoing standard LRP.
  • Standard LRP involved five trocars and one human assistant.

Related Experiment Videos

  • CS LRP utilized a voice-controlled robotic arm for laparoscope manipulation and a mechanical arm for an assisting instrument.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean operative time was similar between CS LRP (324 minutes) and standard LRP (347 minutes).
    • No significant differences were observed in catheterization time, hospital stay, positive margin rates, complications, or short-term oncological and functional outcomes.
    • CS LRP was found to be highly cost-effective compared to the standard technique.

    Conclusions:

    • Complete solo (CS) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is a feasible surgical approach.
    • CS LRP offers advantages including direct control of the operative view, standardized assistance, and enhanced laparoscope stability.
    • Reduced reliance on human operative assistance in CS LRP yields significant economic and organizational benefits.