Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

08:30
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
Published on: February 15, 2015
Early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind trial
Romain A Pauwels1, Søren Pedersen, William W Busse
1Department of Respiratory Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. romain.pauwels@rug.ac.be <romain.pauwels@rug.ac.be>
Lancet (London, England)
|April 4, 2003
Summary
Low-dose budesonide significantly reduced severe asthma exacerbations in recent-onset mild persistent asthma. This treatment also improved asthma control and lung function over three years.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Inhaled glucocorticosteroids are standard for persistent asthma.
- Long-term efficacy in recent-onset, mild persistent asthma remains under-evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term effects of budesonide in mild persistent asthma of recent onset.
- To assess budesonide's impact on severe exacerbations and asthma control.
Main Methods:
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 7241 patients across 32 countries.
- Patients received daily budesonide (400 mcg or 200 mcg for children <11 years) or placebo for 3 years.
- Primary outcome: time to first severe asthma-related event; intention-to-treat analysis.
Main Results:
- Budesonide significantly reduced severe asthma exacerbations (HR 0.56, p<0.0001).
- Patients on budesonide experienced fewer systemic corticosteroid courses and more symptom-free days.
- Budesonide improved lung function (FEV1) and showed consistent effects regardless of baseline parameters.
- A slight reduction in growth was observed in children under 11.
Conclusions:
- Once-daily, low-dose budesonide is effective for mild persistent asthma of recent onset.
- Treatment decreases severe exacerbation risk and enhances overall asthma control.
- Potential growth effects in children warrant consideration.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Randomized Experiments
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

