Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia: a need for reform.

Janis Moody1

  • 1Napier University, School of Acute and Continuing Care Nursing, Edinburgh. j.moody@napier.ac.uk

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
|April 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a nursing education project in partnership: leadership in compassionate care.

Nursing times·2009
Same author

Dementia and personhood: implications for advance directives.

Nursing older people·2003
See all related articles

Recent right-to-die cases highlight confusion around active versus passive euthanasia. Legal reforms are needed to clarify assistance in dying, potentially reclassifying euthanasia as life-terminating acts.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • Nursing Ethics

Background:

  • High-profile right-to-die cases have increased public and legal confusion regarding euthanasia.
  • The distinction between active and passive euthanasia is philosophically debated and legally problematic.
  • Existing legal frameworks struggle to address the complexities of end-of-life decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the confusion surrounding active and passive euthanasia.
  • To explore the philosophical and legal basis of the active-passive distinction.
  • To advocate for a clearer, more honest approach to assistance in dying.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of philosophical arguments on euthanasia.
  • Analysis of legal case law concerning right-to-die issues.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical analysis of the active-passive distinction in end-of-life care.

    • Main Results:

    • The active-passive euthanasia distinction is philosophically flawed and legally distorting.
    • Current legal interpretations exacerbate confusion surrounding end-of-life choices.
    • Reclassifying euthanasia as life-terminating acts may offer a path toward legal clarity.

    Conclusions:

    • The current legal and philosophical distinctions regarding euthanasia are inadequate.
    • Reform is necessary, potentially involving a reclassification of euthanasia as life-terminating acts.
    • Nurses require a robust understanding of the ethical and legal landscape of euthanasia to navigate future roles in providing life-terminating assistance.