Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized controlled trials in pediatric surgery: could we do better?

Joe I Curry1, Barnaby Reeves, Mark D Stringer

  • 1BAPS Multicentre Research Office, British Association of Paediatric Surgeons and Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.

Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|April 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of surgical interventions in patients with severe pressure ulcers: the SIPS mixed-methods exploratory study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
Same author

Gabapentin for Pain Management after Major Surgery: A Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial (the GAP Study).

Anesthesiology·2025
Same author

Patient and surgeon perspectives of a large-scale system for automated, real-time monitoring and feedback of shared decision-making integrated into surgical practice: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Standardised Functional Assessment in Females With Low Anorectal Malformation to Determine Need for Surgery.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2025
Same author

Cohort profile: Outcome Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery (OMACS) - a prospective UK cohort study of cardiac surgery patients at the Bristol Heart Institute.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Prevalence and outcomes of patients taking oral corticosteroids for over 1 month undergoing major surgery in England 2010-2020.

Anaesthesia·2025
Same journal

Illness Uncertainty in Caregivers of Children with Esophageal Atresia: Determinants and Item-Level Patterns in a Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same journal

Posterior Tracheopexy for Pediatric Tracheomalacia: A Global Evidence Synthesis and Meta-analysis.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same journal

Reimagining the Surgical Safety Checklist Through a Pediatric Lens.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same journal

Bridge Fixation Provides Consistent Implant Stability Across Surgical Techniques: A Multicenter Study.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same journal

National Benchmarks for Penetrating Head Injury in U.S. Children and Adolescents: Mechanism, Intent, and Disparities in Mortality.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
Same journal

Long-Term Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of a Standardized Gastroschisis Feeding Protocol: a retrospective cohort study.

Journal of pediatric surgery·2026
See all related articles

Pediatric surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) presented at the BAPS Congress had poor design and inadequate sample sizes. Improving RCT quality is crucial for advancing evidence-based pediatric surgical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Clinical Trials
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating clinical interventions.
  • However, RCTs are infrequently reported in pediatric surgery literature.
  • This study assesses the quality of RCTs submitted to the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) Annual Congress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the design, methodology, statistical analysis, and sample size adequacy of pediatric surgical RCTs presented at BAPS over a five-year period.
  • To determine if these RCTs were sufficiently robust to yield valid results.

Main Methods:

  • A review of abstracts from the Annual BAPS Congress meetings between 1996 and 2000 was conducted.
  • Identifiable clinical RCTs were assessed for design quality, methodology, statistical analysis, conclusions, and sample size adequacy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Collaboration with a senior health services researcher ensured a thorough evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • Only 9 (1%) of 760 accepted abstracts represented clinical RCTs.
    • Few trials specified primary endpoints, documented randomization methods, or mentioned blinding.
    • Sample sizes were insufficient to detect significant clinical differences, and only one RCT has been published.

    Conclusions:

    • Compliance with established RCT guidelines was notably poor in presented pediatric surgical RCT abstracts.
    • Inadequate sample sizes were a common issue, limiting the validity of findings.
    • The specialty would benefit from well-designed, multicenter RCTs to enhance evidence-based pediatric surgical practice.