Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A linear cue combination framework for understanding selective attention.

Richard F Murray1, Allison B Sekuler, Patrick J Bennett

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. richard@psych.utoronto.ca

Journal of Vision
|April 8, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

A model of the Unity High-Definition Render Pipeline, with applications to flat-panel and head-mounted display characterization.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A deep convolutional neural network trained for lightness constancy is susceptible to lightness illusions.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Post COVID-19 condition is associated with altered regional cerebral blood volume as revealed by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same author

Deep neural networks trained for estimating reflectance and illumination achieve lightness constancy differently than human observers.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The effects of aging on directionally selective masking.

Journal of vision·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Researchers developed a new measure of selective attention, called attentional weight, to quantify how much attention is paid to different stimulus parts. Findings show limited ability to focus attention based on contrast polarity, with distractors significantly influencing perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Selective attention is crucial for perceptual judgments.
  • Understanding how attention is allocated to different stimulus features is key.
  • Previous methods for measuring attention allocation have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a quantitative measure of selective attention, termed attentional weight.
  • To investigate the ability to direct selective attention based on stimulus contrast polarity.
  • To assess the influence of attended versus unattended stimulus features on perceptual decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a linear cue combination framework to model perceptual decision-making.
  • Developed two methods to measure attentional weight via trial-by-trial correlations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted experiments on judging global motion and orientation based on contrast polarity.

    • Main Results:

    • Attentional weight measure quantifies attention allocation to stimulus parts.
    • Observers' judgments were significantly influenced by unattended, opposite-contrast-polarity stimuli.
    • Distractor influence was substantial (65% in motion, 25% in orientation tasks) compared to targets.

    Conclusions:

    • Observers have limited capacity to direct selective attention based on contrast polarity.
    • The attentional weight measure provides a robust tool for studying attention.
    • Linear cue combination offers advantages for analyzing selective attention mechanisms.