Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practice development: purpose, methodology, facilitation and evaluation.

Kim Manley1, Brendan McCormack

  • 1Royal College of Nursing Institute, Royal College of Nursing, 20 Cavendish Square, London W1M 0RN. kim.manley@rcn.org.uk

Nursing in Critical Care
|April 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Workarounds and Digital Health: Current Perspectives Through Human Factors, Person-Centred Practice and Patient Safety Lenses.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Professional practice requirements and competency standards for infection prevention and control professionals in residential aged care: A scoping review.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same author

The Peer Reviewer Crisis: Sustaining Scholarly Community or Reimagining the Future of Peer Review?

Journal of clinical nursing·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence and person-centred practice: a critical reflection.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Elements and governance of infection prevention and control programs in residential aged care homes: A scoping review.

American journal of infection control·2026
Same author

Exploring person-centredness in technology-based gait rehabilitation after stroke: A scoping review framework analysis.

Digital health·2026
Same journal

Response to Yu et al.'s Commentary on Effectiveness of Oral Care Intervention and Safe Swallowing Education on Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Patients: A Nurse-Led Quasi-Experimental Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Designing Nurse-Physician Collaboration to Improve Psychological Safety, Satisfaction and Commitment of Critical Care Nurses-A Multi-Informant Survey Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Development of Entrustable Professional Activities for Adult Intensive Care.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Commentary About: Effectiveness of Oral Care Intervention and Safe Swallowing Education on Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Patients: A Nurse-Led Quasi-Experimental Study.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

The Lived Experience of Adult Patients on Mechanical Ventilation: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Nursing in critical care·2026
Same journal

Case Series: Episodes of Care in an Intensive Care Garden-Does Fresh Air Matter?

Nursing in critical care·2026
See all related articles

This study advocates for critical social science in practice development to achieve sustainable change through practitioner enlightenment and empowerment. This approach ensures transparent, rigorous, and systematic practice development, moving beyond technical aspects.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Organizational Development
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Practice development methodologies vary, requiring explicit assumptions for transparency and rigor.
  • Current approaches may overemphasize technical aspects over sustainable change.
  • Different worldviews impact facilitation and evaluation in practice development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a practice development methodology grounded in critical social science.
  • To highlight the importance of practitioner enlightenment, empowerment, and emancipation for sustainable change.
  • To explore the implications of different worldviews on practice development facilitation and outcome evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • The study advocates for a critical social science-informed methodology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It emphasizes achieving sustainable change through practitioner enlightenment, empowerment, and emancipation.
  • It contrasts this with purely technical practice development approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • A critical social science approach fosters sustainable change by addressing underlying assumptions and culture.
    • Practitioner enlightenment, empowerment, and emancipation are key drivers of lasting transformation.
    • Emancipatory practice development, using critical social science, is equivalent to emancipatory action research.

    Conclusions:

    • Explicitly stating assumptions is crucial for transparent and rigorous practice development.
    • A critical social science framework offers a more holistic and sustainable approach to practice development.
    • Emancipatory practice development, rooted in critical social science, promotes profound and lasting change.