Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lasers for facial rejuvenation.

David J Goldberg1

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. drdavidgoldberg@drdavidgoldberg.com

American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
|April 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Facial rejuvenation uses four laser and light-based techniques, each with unique benefits and drawbacks for skin tightening and healing. Choosing the right method depends on the severity of photoaging and desired outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The FUEL FALD Study: Effects of Udenafil on Liver Stiffness and Fibrosis after Fontan.

Pediatric cardiology·2026
Same author

The Fontan Outcomes Network: Findings After 2 Years and 1121 Participants.

Circulation·2026
Same author

A Single-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Retinal Encapsulated in a Novel Biomimetic Exosome in the Treatment of Mild-To-Moderate Facial Photodamage.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2026
Same author

Injectable Use of Topical Cosmetics: A Medicolegal Cause for Concern.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2026
Same author

Clinical Characteristics Associated With Variability in Biopsy Grade Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Fontan Circulation.

JACC. Advances·2025
Same author

The Efficacy and Safety of Synchronous Parallel Ultrasound for the Clinical Improvement of Cellulite Using High-Density Handpiece.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology and Aesthetic Medicine
  • Laser and Light-Based Therapies
  • Skin Rejuvenation Technologies

Background:

  • Laser and similar technologies are increasingly popular for facial rejuvenation.
  • Existing techniques broadly fall into four categories based on epidermal ablation and thermal effects.
  • Each modality offers distinct advantages and disadvantages for treating photoaged skin.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To categorize and compare different laser and light-assisted facial rejuvenation approaches.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms, efficacy, and limitations of each technique.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate treatments based on patient needs and skin conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of techniques into four groups: ablative with significant thermal effect (CO(2) lasers), ablative with minimal thermal effect (short-pulsed Er:YAG lasers), ablative with variable thermal effect (combined lasers, variable pulsed Er:YAG, ablative RF), and non-ablative with minimal thermal effect (non-ablative lasers/light sources).
  • Review of clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of each modality.
  • Analysis of treatment outcomes, including skin tightening, healing time, and potential side effects.

Main Results:

  • CO(2) lasers are effective for advanced photoaging, offering significant skin tightening but potentially longer healing times.
  • Short-pulsed Er:YAG lasers allow for quicker healing with less thermal damage but may yield less dramatic results and more bleeding.
  • Combined/variable ablative devices offer intermediate results, while non-ablative methods are cosmetically elegant but generally less effective than ablative techniques.

Conclusions:

  • All four categories of laser and light-assisted facial rejuvenation techniques are effective.
  • Treatment selection should consider the degree of photoaging, desired outcomes (e.g., tightening vs. healing speed), and potential risks.
  • Non-ablative technologies are evolving, offering less invasive options with generally subtler results compared to ablative methods.

Related Experiment Videos