Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility?

K J Breen1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. KerryBreen@access.net.au

Internal Medicine Journal
|April 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Polycystic Kidneys: Technical Aspects" [Eur. Urol. Open Sci. 67(Supplement 2) (2024) S46].

European urology open science·2025
Same author

Assessment of referral patterns for boys with suspected undescended testes and identification of risk factors to aid diagnosis.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2021
Same author

Penile cancer in Ireland - A national review.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2021
Same author

Research misconduct: time for a re-think?

Internal medicine journal·2016
Same author

Is there a role for the development of a supra-regional network for the management of penile cancer in the Republic of Ireland?

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2014
Same author

Penile cancer--Guideline adherence produces optimum results.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2014
Same journal

Immune-related pancytopenia in pregnancy.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathological findings, correlations and outcomes in patients with renal disease and living with antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Approach to thyroid disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of specialist hypertension clinics.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Thirty-day mortality among patients admitted due to acute myocardial infarction during the dates of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting.

Internal medicine journal·2026
See all related articles

Medical research misconduct is under-reported, posing risks to participants due to publication pressures. Improved ethics education, whistleblower support, and prompt investigations are crucial for prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Ethics
  • Scientific Misconduct

Background:

  • Persistent reporting of diverse misconduct in medical research.
  • Under-reporting and increased detection suggest unknown true incidence.
  • Rising participant risks linked to publication and commercialization pressures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the prevalence and risks of medical research misconduct.
  • To identify factors contributing to misconduct and inadequate institutional responses.
  • To propose strategies for preventing and addressing research misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of reported cases and contributing factors.
  • Review of institutional responses to misconduct allegations.
  • Discussion of potential preventative measures and policy reforms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Medical research misconduct remains a significant issue with potential under-reporting.
  • Institutional responses are often slow and insufficient.
  • Increased pressure for publication and commercialization exacerbates risks.

Conclusions:

  • Enhanced researcher ethics education is vital.
  • Protection and support for whistleblowers are necessary.
  • Prompt and adequate investigation processes are essential.
  • Debate on institutional vs. national handling of misconduct and medical board involvement is needed.