Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026
Utero-tubal Embryo Transfer and Vasectomy in the Mouse Model
Published on: February 28, 2014
Comparison of Marie Stopes scalpel and electrocautery no-scalpel vasectomy techniques
Timothy Black1, Colin Francome
1Marie Stopes International, London, UK. timblack@stopes.org.uk
Objective:
To compare the intra-operative experience and postoperative sequelae between the standard Marie Stopes scalpel vasectomy procedure and electrocautery non-scalpel vasectomy (ENSV) techniques.
Design:
Randomised prospective comparative study.
Setting:
Marie Stopes vasectomy centres in the UK.
Participants:
A total of 325 men undergoing vasectomy between January and June 1999.
Intervention:
Random allocation to the two study arms plus questionnaires at 4 and 14 weeks postoperatively.
Main Outcome Measures:
Ease and speed of the procedure; pain levels during and after the procedure; early postoperative complications and time taken to return to work and sexual activity.
Results:
The ENSV technique was marginally quicker to perform. Pain levels intra-operatively were comparable. Response rates to the questionnaire were 84.6% and 37% at 4 and 14 weeks, respectively. The ENSV group experienced less pain and bleeding from the wound postoperatively and were quicker to heal. For men who experienced postoperative problems, the time taken to return to work was marginally better in the ENSV group. The time taken to return to sexual activity was marginally faster in the ENSV group.
Conclusion:
The ENSV procedure appears to be suitable for mass application in locations where electricity is available.
Insights
Electrocautery non-scalpel vasectomy (ENSV) offers a quicker recovery with less pain and bleeding compared to the standard scalpel method. This makes ENSV a suitable option for widespread application where electricity is available.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Vasectomy is a common surgical procedure for male sterilization.
- Traditional scalpel vasectomy and newer non-scalpel techniques are widely used.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the intra-operative experience and postoperative outcomes of standard scalpel vasectomy with electrocautery non-scalpel vasectomy (ENSV).
Main Methods:
- A randomized prospective comparative study involving 325 men undergoing vasectomy.
- Participants were randomly assigned to either the standard scalpel or ENSV technique.
- Data on procedure experience and postoperative recovery were collected via questionnaires at 4 and 14 weeks.
Main Results:
- The ENSV technique was marginally faster and resulted in less postoperative pain and bleeding.
- Patients in the ENSV group experienced quicker wound healing and marginally faster return to work and sexual activity.
- Intra-operative pain levels were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- Electrocautery non-scalpel vasectomy (ENSV) demonstrates favorable postoperative outcomes compared to the standard scalpel technique.
- The ENSV procedure is a viable option for large-scale vasectomy programs, provided electricity is accessible.
