Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classification of aphasic phenomena.

A Kertesz

    The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. Le Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques
    |May 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study surveys aphasia classification, identifying four main types: Broca's, Wernicke's, anomic, and global. Objective numerical taxonomy may resolve ongoing debates in aphasia categorization.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Smoking and Psoriasis as Synergistic Risk Factors in Periodontal disease.

    Fogorvosi szemle·2018
    Same author

    Recovery in aphasia and language networks.

    NeuroRehabilitation·2014
    Same author

    Progressive supranuclear palsy in a family with TDP-43 pathology.

    Neurocase·2014
    Same author

    Opportunities for teaching and research in clinical neurosciences in Central and Eastern Europe.

    European journal of neurology·2013
    Same author

    Retroperitoneal fibrosis as manifestation of chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.

    Bone marrow transplantation·2012
    Same author

    The overlapping syndromes of the pick complex.

    Current Alzheimer research·2011

    Area of Science:

    • Neurolinguistics
    • Neuropsychology
    • Speech-Language Pathology

    Background:

    • Aphasia classification is complex, with ongoing debate among researchers.
    • Current systems often describe four primary aphasia types: Broca's, Wernicke's, anomic, and global.
    • Less common classifications include conduction and transcortical aphasias, with pure modality-specific syndromes being rare.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a comprehensive overview of current aphasia classification systems.
    • To highlight the main categories of aphasia commonly recognized.
    • To discuss the persistent controversy in aphasia classification and propose a potential solution.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and synthesis of existing research on aphasia classification.
    • Analysis of commonly described aphasia types and their characteristics.
    • Discussion of the theoretical divide between 'unifiers' and 'splitters' in the field.

    Main Results:

    • Identification of four major, widely accepted aphasia classifications: Broca's, Wernicke's, anomic, and global.
    • Acknowledgement of less frequently described types like conduction and transcortical aphasias.
    • Recognition that purely modality-specific syndromes are seldom observed.

    Conclusions:

    • The classification of aphasia remains a subject of debate.
    • Objective numerical taxonomy presents a promising approach to resolving classification challenges.
    • Standardized, data-driven methods could lead to more consistent aphasia diagnosis and understanding.

    Related Experiment Videos