Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Is the outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy related to the underlying etiology?
Maurizio Gasparini1, Massimo Mantica, Paola Galimberti
1Department of Cardiology, Humanitas Clinical Institute, Rozzano, Milan, Italy. maurizio.gasparini@humanitas.it
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart failure outcomes, but non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients show greater benefits than those with coronary artery disease. Underlying cardiac pathology impacts CRT effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and wide QRS duration.
- The impact of underlying cardiac pathology, specifically coronary artery disease (CAD) versus non-ischemic etiologies, on CRT outcomes is not fully elucidated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of underlying cardiac pathology on the effectiveness of CRT.
- To compare CRT outcomes in patients with DCM due to CAD versus non-ischemic causes.
- To determine if myocardial scar tissue limits CRT benefits.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, longitudinal, comparative study included 158 patients with DCM and CRT indications.
- Patients were divided into a coronary artery disease (CAD) group and a non-CAD (non-ischemic DCM) group.
- Outcomes including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and NYHA functional class were assessed at baseline and follow-up.
Main Results:
- Both CAD and non-CAD groups showed significant improvements in LVEF, 6MWT distance, and NYHA class after CRT.
- Patients in the non-CAD group experienced a significantly greater increase in LVEF (P = 0.007) and a greater decrease in NYHA class (P < 0.05) compared to the CAD group.
- Despite improvements in the CAD group, non-CAD patients demonstrated superior response to CRT.
Conclusions:
- Underlying cardiac pathology significantly influences CRT outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
- Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients achieve better improvements in LVEF and functional class with CRT compared to those with CAD.
- Myocardial scar in CAD may represent a limitation to achieving optimal cardiac resynchronization and functional improvement with CRT.
Abstract:
This study was designed to examine the importance of the underlying cardiac pathology on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), hypothesizing that myocardial infarction scar and other noncontractile segments represent limitations to the ability to resynchronize cardiac contraction in patients with congestive heart failure associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. From October 1999 to April 2002, 158 patients (mean age 65 years, 121 men) were included in a single center, longitudinal, comparative study. All patients had dilated cardiomyopathy and indications for CRT with a mean QRS duration of 174 ms. The patient population was divided into a coronary artery disease (CAD) group that included patients with significant CAD, and no indication, or a contraindication for revascularization, and a non-CAD group that included patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomypopathy. Follow-up data were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. The median follow-up was 11.2 months. In the CAD group, the LVEF increased from 0.29 to 0.34 (P < 0.0001), the 6-minute walk test distance increased from 310 to 463 m (P < 0.0001), and the percentage of patients in NYHA functional Class III-IV decreased from 83% to 23% (P = 0.04). In the non-CAD group, LVEF increased from 29% to 42% (P < 0.0001), the 6-minute walk test distance increased from 332 to 471 m (P < 0.0001), and the percentage of patients in NYHA functional Class III-IV decreased from 79% to 5%, (P < 0.0001). Comparison of the two groups showed that patients in the non-CAD group had a significantly greater increase in LVEF (P = 0.007) and decrease in NYHA class (P < 0.05). Patients with CAD or non-CAD significantly improved clinically during CRT. Non-CAD patients had a greater increase in LVEF and decrease in NYHA functional class than patients with CAD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias

