Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selective attention affects human brain stem frequency-following response.

Gary C Galbraith1, Darlene M Olfman, Todd M Huffman

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Mental Retardation Research Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Research Group at Lanterman Developmental Center, P.O. Box 100-R, Pomona, CA 91769, USA. garyg@ucld.edu

Neuroreport
|April 15, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Slc4a11 gene disruption in mice: cellular targets of sensorineuronal abnormalities.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2009
Same author

Binaural unmasking of frequency-following responses in rat amygdala.

Journal of neurophysiology·2008
Same author

Auditory frequency-following responses in rat ipsilateral inferior colliculus.

Neuroreport·2008
Same author

Neural crest cell deficiency of c-myc causes skull and hearing defects.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)·2007
Same author

Correlated brain stem and cortical evoked responses to auditory tone change.

Neuroreport·2004
Same author

Brain stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans.

Neuroreport·2004
Same journal

Electroacupuncture alleviates neuroinflammation and promotes recovery of neurological functions after intracerebral hemorrhage by modulating α7nAChR/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Non-cell-autonomous regulation of Bhlhb5 expression in cortical projection neurons by GABAergic interneuron development and position.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 mediates inflammatory response via NLRP3 inflammasome and neuron damage after traumatic brain injury.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Methyltransferase-like 14 alleviates neuronal ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease by regulating the peroxiredoxin 6/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Hand mental rotation reaction time reflects motor imagery strategy and predicts changes in finger dexterity after motor imagery.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Functional exploration of metabotropic glycine receptors in cultured rat hippocampal slices.

Neuroreport·2026
See all related articles

Selective attention enhances the brain stem auditory frequency-following response (FFR). This suggests attention influences early auditory processing in the brain stem, impacting sensory pathways.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Selective attention is known to modulate long-latency cortical potentials.
  • The impact of attention on short-latency brain stem potentials remains controversial.
  • The auditory frequency-following response (FFR) reflects early neural processing of sound.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of selective attention on the brain stem auditory frequency-following response (FFR).
  • To determine if attention modulates early auditory processing at the brain stem level.

Main Methods:

  • Young adults performed auditory and visual detection tasks while listening to a periodic tone.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded from five midline scalp electrodes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The FFR was elicited by the repetitive tone during both attention tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • FFR amplitudes were significantly larger during the auditory attention task compared to the visual task.
    • Individual differences in maximal FFR amplitude sites were observed.
    • The FFR demonstrated sensitivity to attentional modulation at the brain stem level.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective attention can modify signal processing in the brain stem's sensory pathways.
    • This modulation may involve top-down preprocessing via descending cortical pathways.
    • The FFR is a reliable indicator of early auditory neural processing, showing attentional effects distinct from transient evoked potentials.