Related Experiment Videos
Tube feeding and bone marrow transplantation
G D Hopman1, E G Peña, S Le Cessie
1Department of Dietietics and Nutrition, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Medical and Pediatric Oncology
|April 15, 2003
Summary
Tube feeding (TF) is a viable alternative to parenteral nutrition (PN) for children undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This study found TF to be equally effective, well-tolerated, and more cost-effective than PN for pediatric BMT patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Hematology
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Children undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) often experience poor oral intake due to intensive conditioning therapy.
- Nutritional support (NS) is crucial, with tube feeding (TF) generally preferred over parenteral nutrition (PN) due to its physiological benefits and lower complication rates.
- Despite preferences, children undergoing BMT are frequently managed with PN.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the tolerance and adequacy of tube feeding (TF) in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT).
- To compare the efficacy, complications, and costs of TF versus parenteral nutrition (PN) in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving two groups: TF (n=12) and PN (n=22).
- Nutritional status, intake, complications, and costs were assessed.
- Patients were transitioned to additional or total PN if TF intolerance occurred.
Main Results:
- Both TF and PN groups achieved adequate nutritional status, meeting 85% of requirements.
- TF was successfully implemented on 62% of NS days, with three children exclusively fed via TF.
- Extended pre-transplant TF duration correlated with improved enteral tolerance.
- Gastrointestinal symptoms were similar between groups, but cholestasis was less frequent with TF.
- The mean cost per child was $440 lower in the TF group compared to the PN group.
Conclusions:
- Tube feeding (TF) is a feasible and effective nutritional support method for children undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT).
- TF demonstrates comparable efficacy to parenteral nutrition (PN) in this population.
- TF offers significant potential cost savings, making it a budget-friendly option.